Full Article - Open Access.

Idioma principal

Evaluation of bone-implant interfaces on iso5832-9 and ti6al4v alloys after thin-anodic oxide film growth

Costa, T. C. da; Taminato, L. A.; Gomes, A. R. S.; Ponte, H. A.; Marino, C. E. B.;

Full Article:

Titanium alloys and seeveral stainless steels show good performance when used in orthopedic replacements due to their excellent properties, such as mechanical strength and corrosion resistance. The aim of this study was to evaluate the implant-bone interface on ISO 5832-9 and Ti6Al4V alloys electrochemical treated. Methods: The growth of oxides was carried out on stainless steel ISO 5832-9 up to1.0V in phosphate buffered saline and Ti6Al4V alloy up to 5.0V, at room temperature. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used for qualitative characterization. The in vivo experiment was conducted with rats divided into 3 groups: untreated surface-Control (Group 1); anodic oxide grown up to 1.0V for ISO 5832-9 and up to 5.0V for Ti6Al4V (Group 2); anodic oxide grown up to 1.0V for ISO 5832-9 and up to 5.0V for Ti6Al4V and surface activation with hydroxyapatite (Hpa) in SBF (10 days) for both materials (Group 3). The implants were inserted in tibia by surgery. After 6 weeks the animals were euthanized and tibia processed for SEM. Results: Ti6Al4V alloy had a typical valve’s metal behaviour due to stable oxide titanium growing as barrier. ISO 5832-9 stainless steel showed stable oxide but as a thinner film irregularly distributed on the surface of implants. These behaviours were consistent with in vivo test which showed uniform bone matrix deposition on the Ti6Al4V surface of bone implants. There is not implant-bone interface when titanium alloy was subjected to anodizing or anodizing/Hpa. Discussion: potentiodynamic titanium oxides enhanced the osseointegration process.

Full Article:

Palavras-chave: titanium alloys, bone tissue, osseointegration, scanning electron microscopy,

Palavras-chave: ,

DOI: 10.5151/chempro-s3ie2016-04

Referências bibliográficas
  • [1] Amini AR, Laurencin CT, Nukavarapu SP. Bone tissue engineering: recent advances and challenges. Crit Rev Biomed Eng. 2012; 40 (5): 363-408.
  • [2] Buser D, Nydegger T, Oxland D.L,.et al. Interface shear strength of titanium implants with sandblasted and acid-etched surface: a biomechanical study in the maxilla of miniature pigs, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 1999; 45:75-83.
  • [3] Clarke SA, Brooks RA, Lee PT, Rushton N. Bone growth into a ceramic-filled defect around an implant-the response to transforming growth factor beta1, J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 2004; 86:126-134.
  • [4] Davies JE, Mendes VC, Ko JC, Ajami E. Topographic scale-range synergy at the functional bone/implant interface. Biomaterials. 2014; 35(1):25-35.
  • [5] Franco RL, Chiesa R, Oliveira RT, Belo MM, Rosa AL. Bone Response to a Caand P-Enriched Titanium Surface Obtained By Anodization, Braz. Dent. J. 2008; 19:15-20.
  • [6] Hanawa T, Hiromoto S, Yamamoto A, Kuroda D, Asami K. XPS characterization of the surface Oxide Film of 316L Stainless Steel Samples that was located in Quasi –Biological Environments, Materials Transactions. 2002; 43:3088-3092.
  • [7] Kokubo T, Miyaji F, Kim HM. Spontaneous Formation of Bonelike Apatite Layer on Chemically Treated Titanium Metals, J. Am.Ceram. Soc. 1996; 79:1127- 1129.
  • [8] Kokubo T, Takadama H. How useful is SBF in predicting In Vivo bone bioactivity? Biomaterials. 2006; 15: 2907-2915.
  • [9] Liang B, Fujibayashi S, Neo m, Tamura J, Kim H, Uchida M, kokubo T, Nakamura T. Histological and mechanical investigation of bone-bonding ability of anodically oxidized titanium in rabbits. Biomaterials.2003; 24 (27): 4959-4966.
  • [10] Lin Z, Wang Y, Wang D, Zhao B, Li J. Porous structure preparation and wettability control on titanium implant, Surf. Coat. Technol. 2013; 228 (1): 131-136.
  • [11] Liu X, Chu PK. Surface Modification of Titanium, Titanium Alloys and Related Materials for Biomedical Applications, Mater. Sci. Eng. R.2004; 47; 49-121.
  • [12] Marino CEB, Oliveira EM, Rocha-Filho RC, Biaggio SR. On the stability of thin-anodic-oxide films of titanium in acid phosphoric media, Corr. Sci. 2001; 43:1465-1476.
  • [13] Marino CEB, Mascaro LH. EIS characterization of Ti-dental implant in artificial saliva media: dissolution process of the oxide barrier, J. Electroanal. Chem. 2004; 568: 115-120.
  • [14] Marino CEB, Nascente PAP, Biaggio SR, Rocha-Filho RC, Bocchi N.XPS Characterization of anodic titanium oxide films grown in phosphate buffer solution, Thin Solid Films. 2004; 468:109-112.
  • [15] Marino CEB, Biaggio SR, Rocha-Filho RC, Bocchi N. Voltammetric stability of anodic films on the Ti6Al4V alloy in chloride medium. Electrochim. Acta. 2006; 51:6580–6588.
  • [16] Mendes VC, Moineddin R, Davies JE. The effect of discrete calcium phosphate nanocrystals on bone-bonding to titanium surfaces. Biomaterials. 2007; 28(32):4748-55. Epub 2007 Aug 13.
  • [17] Novaes AB, Souza SLS, Barros RRM, Pereira KKY, Iezz G, Piattelli A. Influence of Implant Surfaces on Osseointegration, Braz. Dent. J. 2010; 21:471-481.
  • [18] Pulleo DA and Nanci A. Understanding and Controlling the Bone Implant Interface. Biomaterials.1999; 20:2311-2321.
  • [19] Szesz EM, Pereira BL, Kuromoto NK, Marino CEB, Souza GB, Soares P. Electrochemical and morphology analyses on the titanium surface modified by shot blasting and anodic oxidation processes, Thin Solid Films.2013; 528: 163-166
  • [20] Sul Y. The significance of the surface properties of oxidized titanium to the bone response: special emphasis on potential biochemical bonding of oxidized titanium implant. Biomaterials. 2003; 24: 3893-3907.
  • [21] Villamil RFV, Aranha H, Afonso MLCA, Mercadante MT, Agostinho SML. Aços inoxidáveis em implantes ortopédicos: fundamentos e resistência à corrosão. Rev. Bras. Ortop. 2002; 37, ( 11/12):471-476.
  • [22] Yang B, Uchida M, Kim HM, Zhang X, Kokubo T. Preparation of bioactive titanium metal by anodic oxidation treatment. Biomaterials.2004; 25: 1003-1010.
  • [23] Yi Y, Cho P, Al Zaabi A, Addad Y, Jang C. Potentiodynamic polarization behavior for AISI 316L stainless steel in NaCl solution. Corr. Sci. 2013; 74:92-97.
  • [24] Yu WQ, Jiang XQ, Zhang FQ, Xu L. The effect of anataseTiO2 nanotube layers on MC3T3-E1 preosteoblast adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A. 2010; 94:1012-1022.
  • [25] Yun K, Yang Y, Lim H, Oh G, Hoh J, Bae I, Kim J, Lee K; Park S. Effect of Nanotubular-micro-roughed titanium Surface on cell response in vitro and osseointegration in vivo. Mater. Sci. Eng. C. 2010; 30: 27-33.
  • [26] Zhu X, Kim KH, Jeong Y. Anodic oxide films containing Ca and P on Titanium, Biomaterials.2002; 22: 2199-2206.
Como citar:

Costa, T. C. da; Taminato, L. A.; Gomes, A. R. S.; Ponte, H. A.; Marino, C. E. B.; "Evaluation of bone-implant interfaces on iso5832-9 and ti6al4v alloys after thin-anodic oxide film growth", p. 43-56 . In: Proceedings of 2nd International Seminar on Industrial Innovation in Electrochemistry . São Paulo: Blucher, 2016. São Paulo: Blucher, 2016.
ISSN 2318-4043, DOI 10.5151/chempro-s3ie2016-04

últimos 30 dias | último ano | desde a publicação


downloads


visualizações


indexações