Conference full papers - Open Access.

Idioma principal

Women and intersectionality: perspectives based on digital fabrication as a viable plataform for assistive design

Women and intersectionality: perspectives based on digital fabrication as a viable plataform for assistive design

Soares, Juliana Maria Moreira; Campos, Paulo Eduardo Fonseca de;

Conference full papers:

This article aims to present analyzes and perceptions regarding the experience of a project developed under the following axes: women, disabilities and the development of Assistive Technology in spaces called Fablabs. The study is developed according to an exploratory approach, with a qualitative nature. This paper provides an introduction, an exploration of the experiments and the reflections over the performed activities. In the practical stages, among others, methods of an ethnographic nature and Design Research were used. The group of women, mothers of children with disabilities, variable in size during the practices (from two to five people), carried out activities to develop assistive technology products using digital manufacturing tools in a public laboratory of the Fablab Livre SP Network , in the city of São Paulo, Brazil. The reflections of this study go towards questions related to women's self- esteem in the face of processes of inclusion in the technological area. The multi-signification of the Fablab space and the need to expand the intersectional debate within these environments are also encounters provided by this research.

Conference full papers:

Palavras-chave: Women, isability, fablabs, assistive technology, digital fabrication,

Palavras-chave:

DOI: 10.5151/sigradi2020-37

Referências bibliográficas
  • [1] AGUSTINI, G. (2014). O momento dos laboratórios como espaço de criatividade, inovação e invenção. In: COSTA, E; AGUSTINI, G. (Org.). De baixo para cima. Rio de Janeiro: Aeroplano.
  • [2] BENEDETTO, I. L. C. (2011). Contribuições metodológicas para o desenvolvimento de produtos em tecnologia assistiva. 2011. 162 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Design) - Escola e Engenharia, Faculdade de Arquitetura, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre.
  • [3] BERSCH, R. (2017). Introdução à Tecnologia Assistiva. Porto Alegre: Assistiva – Tecnologia e Educação.
  • [4] BUEHLER, E.; KANE, S. K.; HURST, A. (2014). ABC and 3D:
  • [5] opportunities and obstacles to 3D printing in special education environments. In: Proc. ASSETS’14, 2014, pp. 107–114.
  • [6] BUEHLER, E. et al.et al. (2015). Sharing is caring: assistive technology designs on Thingiverse. In: 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Proceedings... Seoul: Yonsei University, p. 525–534.
  • [7] CHIOVETTI, S. P. (2017). Inovação nos Serviços Públicos na cidade de São Paulo (2013-2016). São Paulo: Fundação Perseu Abramo. 136 p. COSTA, C. R. et al. (2015). Dispositivos de tecnologia assistiva: fatores relacionados ao abandono. Cad. Ter. Ocup. UFSCar, São Carlos, v. 23, n. 3, p. 611-624.
  • [8] DINIZ, D. (2003). Modelo social da deficiência: a crítica feminista.
  • [9] Série Anis, v. 28, p. 1-8.
  • [10] DOUGHERTY, D. (2013). The maker mindset. In: HONEY, M.; KANTER, D. E. (Eds.), Design/Make/Play. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • [11] FAULKNER, W. (2001). The technology question in feminism: a view from feminist technology studies. Women’s Studies International Forum, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 79–95.
  • [12] GERSHENFELD. N. (2012). How to Make Almost Anything: The Digital Fabrication Revolution. Foreign Affairs, 91, n. 6, p. 43-57.
  • [13] GUERRA, C. S. et al. (2015). Do sonho a realidade: vivência de mães de filhos com deficiência. Texto Contexto Enferm, Florianópolis, 24(2): 459-66.
  • [14] HURLEY, U. (2018). “The Embodiment of Pure Thought”? Digital Fabrication, Disability, and New Possibilities for Auto|Biography, a/b: Auto/Biography Studies, 33:2, 285-
  • [15] 300.
  • [16] IBGE – Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. (2012). Censo Demográfico 2010. Resultados gerais da amostra. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE.
  • [17] KINTSCH, A.; DEPAULA, R. (2002). A framewok for the adoption of assistive technology. In: Conference on Assistive Technologies, 5., 2002, Edinburgh. Proceedings... New York: ACM. 11 p.
  • [18] NEMORIN, S. (2016). The Frustrations of Digital Fabrication: An Auto/Ethnographic Exploration of ,“3D Making in School”. International Journal of Technology and Design Education 27.4, 517–35. Springer.
  • [19] LAMB, M. E.; BILLINGS, L. A. L. (1996). Fathers of children with special needs. In: M. E. Lamb. (Org.). The role of the father in child development. London: John Wiley & Sons. p. 179-190.
  • [20] LÉVY, P. (2003). A inteligência coletiva: por uma antropologia do ciberespaço. 4a ed. São Paulo: Loyola.
  • [21] PEDERSON, C. C. (2016). Situating Making in Contemporary Latin America Feminist Art. Journal of Peer Produciton. Issue #8: Feminism and (un)hacking.
  • [22] PLANT, S. (1995). The Future Looms: Weaving Women and Cybernetics. In: FEATHERSTONE, M.; BURROWS, R.
  • [23] (eds). Cyberspace/Cyberbodies/Cyberpunk. Cultures of Technological Embodiment. London: Sage Publications. p. 45-64.
  • [24] SCHIENBINGER, L. (2001). O Feminismo Mudou a Ciência?
  • [25] Bauru/SP: EDUSC.
  • [26] VENDRUSCULO, L. E. B. (2014). A descoberta da deficiência do filho: o luto e a elaboração dos pais. 2014, 34 f. Monografia (Bacharelado em Psicologia) – Departamento de Humanidades e Educação, Universidade Regional do Noroeste do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul, Ijuí.
  • [27] WAJCMAN, J. (2004). Technofeminism. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
Como citar:

Soares, Juliana Maria Moreira; Campos, Paulo Eduardo Fonseca de; "Women and intersectionality: perspectives based on digital fabrication as a viable plataform for assistive design", p. 267-274 . In: Congreso SIGraDi 2020. São Paulo: Blucher, 2020.
ISSN 2318-6968, DOI 10.5151/sigradi2020-37

últimos 30 dias | último ano | desde a publicação


downloads


visualizações


indexações