Artigo completo - Open Access.

Idioma principal

The relationship between public support and degree of novelty of innovation in Brazil

Mascarini, Suelene; Garcia, Renato; Vonortas, Nicholas;

Artigo completo:

This paper investigates the association between public support and degree of novelty of innovation in Brazil. We examine empirically two kinds of public funding, for R&D and for general activities (including R&D). The data source is edition of Brazilian Innovation Survey (PINTEC 2008 and 2011). The study provides evidence that both public support are related to the degree of novelty of innovation. We conclude that the public support for R&D is related with higher degrees of innovation than public support for general activities. Therefore, the policies should be formulated thinking on the degree of novelty of the innovation to be achieved.

Artigo completo:

Palavras-chave: Degree of novelty of innovation; public support; R&D and non-R&D,

Palavras-chave:

DOI: 10.5151/iv-enei-2019-6.2-076

Referências bibliográficas
  • [1] Amara, Nabil, Réjean Landry, Nizar Becheikh, and Mathieu Ouimet. 2008. “Learning and Novelty of Innovation in Established Manufacturing SMEs.” Technovation 28 (7): 450–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2008.02.00
  • [2] Arbix, Glauco, and Flávia Consoni. 2011. “Inovar Para Transformar a Universidade Brasileira.” Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais 26 (77): 205–24.
  • [3] Brasil. 2004. “Law 10,97” 2004. http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2004-2006/2004/lei/l10.97htm.
  • [4] ———. 2005. “Law 11,196.” 2005. http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_Ato2004-2006/2005/Lei/L11196.htm.
  • [5] Cin, Beom Cheol, Young Jun Kim, and Nicholas S. Vonortas. 2017. “The Impact of Public R&D Subsidy on Small Firm Productivity: Evidence from Korean SMEs.” Small Business Economics 48 (2): 345–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9786-x.
  • [6] Cohen, Wesley M, and Daniel a Levinthal. 1990. “Absorptive Capacity : A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation Wesley M . Cohen ; Daniel A . Levinthal Absorptive Capacity : A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation.” Administrative Science Quarterly 35 (1): 128–52. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553.
  • [7] Colombo, Daniel Gama e, and Helio Nogueira da Cruz. 2018. Impacts of the Brazilian Innovation Tax Policy on the Composition of Private Investments and on the Type of Innovation. Revista Brasileira de Inovação. Vol. 1 https://doi.org/10.20396/rbi.v17i2.8651500.
  • [8] Feldman, Maryann P., and Maryellen R. Kelley. 2003. “Leveraging Research and Development: Assessing the Impact of the U.S. Advanced Technology Program.” Small Business Economics 20 (2): 153–65. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022264031993.
  • [9] “FINEP.” n.d. Accessed May 18, 201 http://www.finep.gov.br/afinep/65-fontes-de-recurso/fundos-setoriais.
  • [10] Freeman, C, and L Soete. 2008. A Economia Da Inovação Industrial. Campinas: Editora Da Unicamp.
  • [11] Garcia, Renato, Veneziano Araujo, Suelene Mascarini, Emerson Gomes Santos, and Ariana Costa. 2015. “Looking at Both Sides: How Specific Characteristics of Academic Research Groups and Firms Affect the Geographical Distance of University--Industry Linkages.” Regional Studies, Regional Science 2 (1): 518–34.
  • [12] Georghiou, L. 1994. “Impact of the Framework Programme on European Industry. EUR 15907 EN.” Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the EC.
  • [13] Georghiou, Luke. 2002. “Impact and Additionality of Innovation Policy.” IWT Studies 40: 57–64.
  • [14] Jr, Kannebley, Sergio, and Geciane Porto. 2012. “Incentivos Fiscais à Desenvolvimento e Inovação No Brasil : Uma Avaliação Das Políticas Incentivos Fiscais à Pesquisa , Desenvolvimento e Inovação No Brasil : Uma Avaliação Das Políticas.” Banco Interamericano de Desenvolvimento - DOCUMENTO PARA DISCUSSÃO, 1–57.
  • [15] Júnior, Sérgio Kannebley, and Diogo de Prince. 20 “Restrição Financeira e Financiamento Público à Inovação No Brasil: Uma Análise Com Base Em Microdados Da PINTEC.” Nova Economia 25 (3): 553–74. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6351/2078.
  • [16] Manual, Oslo. 2005. “The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities.” Proposed Guidelines for Collecting an Interpreting Technological Innovation Data.
  • [17] McDermott, Christopher M, and Gina Colarelli O’Connor. 2002. “Managing Radical Innovation: An Overview of Emergent Strategy Issues.” Journal of Product Innovation Management 19 (6): 424–38.
  • [18] Neicu, Daniel, Peter Teirlinck, and Stijn Kelchtermans. 2016. “Dipping in the Policy Mix: Do R&D Subsidies Foster Behavioral Additionality Effects of R&D Tax Credits?” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 25 (3): 218–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2015.1076192.
  • [19] Rapini, Márcia Siqueira. 2013. “Padrão De Financiamento Aos Investimentos Em Inovação No Brasil.” TEXTO PARA DISCUSSÃO TEXTO PARA. http://www.cedeplar.ufmg.br/pesquisas/td/TD 497.pdf.
  • [20] Suzigan, Wilson, Eduardo Albuquerque, Renato Garcia, and Marcia Rapini. 2009. “University and Industry Linkages in Brazil: Some Preliminary and Descriptive Results.” Seoul Journal of Economics 22 (4): 591–611. https://doi.org/http://www.sje.ac.kr.
  • [21] Williams, Richard. 2016. “Understanding and Interpreting Generalized Ordered Logit Models.” Journal of Mathematical Sociology 40 (1): 7–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022250X.2015.1112384.
Como citar:

Mascarini, Suelene; Garcia, Renato; Vonortas, Nicholas; "The relationship between public support and degree of novelty of innovation in Brazil", p. 1185-1196 . In: Anais do IV Encontro Nacional de Economia Industrial e Inovação. São Paulo: Blucher, 2019.
ISSN 2357-7592, DOI 10.5151/iv-enei-2019-6.2-076

últimos 30 dias | último ano | desde a publicação


downloads


visualizações


indexações