Artigo completo - Open Access.

Idioma principal

The La Marca Model Revisited: Structuralist Goodwin Cycles with Evolutionary Supply Side and Balance of Payments Constraints

Spinola, Danilo Sartorello ;

Artigo completo:

High economic volatility and large amplitude economic cycles are problems that persist in middle-income countries, especially Latin America, reinforcing the presence of development traps. This research is aimed at investigating the causes of this volatility. The existence of growth cycles has been broadly discussed in the literature since the times of Kondratiev and Schumpeter. However, the literature modeling endogenous deterministic mechanisms that generate these cycles is scarce. This article contributes to fill this gap by merging the macroeconomic demand-side perspective à la Goodwin-Kaldor with the evolutionary supply-side Neo-Schumpeterian theory - creating endogenous cycles. This article expands the open-economy Structuralist Goodwin model of La Marca (2010), in which economic activity, income distribution and accumulation of foreign assets dynamically interact generating dampened cycles. The expansion consists in adding to the model (1) an evolutionary supply-side in which innovation is at the center of the economic dynamic affecting the productivity through technology transfer and the Kaldor-Verdoorn effect. (2) An external sector dynamics that changes the exchange rate regime, following Dornbusch (1992)’s Latin Triangle theory. Nominal exchange rate behaves following the Balance of Payments Dominance theory (Ocampo, 2011), adjusting its value to avoid external sector deficits. Results point to (I) a productivity dynamics leading to the emergence of endogenous stable cycles. The economy does not converge to a steady state, and instability becomes a deterministic inherent characteristic of middle-income economies. (II) A change in the currency regime reduces volatility by turning a stable cycle trajectory into a monotonic convergence at the cost of lower economic activity and wage share (in total output).

Artigo completo:

Palavras-chave: Economic Cycles, Evolutionary theory, Structuralism, Macroeconomic Dynamics,

Palavras-chave:

DOI: 10.5151/iv-enei-2019-1.3-074

Referências bibliográficas
  • [1] Barbosa-Filho, N. H., & Taylor, L. (2006). Distributive and Demand Cycles in the Us Economy—a Structuralist Goodwin Model. Metroeconomica, 57, 389–41
  • [2] Bhaduri, A., & Marglin, S. (1990). Unemployment and the real wage: the economic basis for contesting political ideologies. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 14, 375–393.
  • [3] Bowles, S., & Boyer, R. (1988). Labor Discipline and Aggregate Demand: A Macroeconomic Model. The American Economic Review, 78, 395–400.
  • [4] Ciarli, T., Lorentz, A., Savona, M., & Valente, M. (2010). The Effect of Consumption and Production Structure on Growth and Distribution. a Micro to Macro Model. Metroeconomica, 61, 180–218.
  • [5] Cimoli, M. (1988). Technological Gaps and Institutional Asymmetries in a North-South Model with a Continuum of Goods. Metroeconomica, 39, 245–274.
  • [6] Cimoli, M., & Porcile, G. (2014). Technology, structural change and BOP-constrained growth: a structuralist toolbox. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 38, 215–237.
  • [7] Dornbusch, R. (1992). The Case for Trade Liberalization in Developing Countries. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 6, 69–85.
  • [8] Dosi, G., Fagiolo, G., & Roventini, A. (2010). Schumpeter meeting Keynes: A policy-friendly model of endogenous growth and business cycles. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 34, 1748–1767.
  • [9] Erten, B., & Ocampo, J. A. (2013). Super Cycles of Commodity Prices Since the Mid-Nineteenth Century. World Development, 44, 14–30.
  • [10] Foley, D., & Taylor, L. (2004). A Heterodox Growth and Distribution Model.
  • [11] Foster-McGregor, N., Kaba, I., & Szirmai, A. (2015). Structural change and the ability to sustain growth (MERIT Working Paper No. 048). United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT). Retrieved from https://econpapers.repec.org/paper/unmunumer/2015048.htm
  • [12] Gaffeo, E., Gallegati, M., Giulioni, G., & Palestrini, A. (2008). Emergent Macroeconomics: an Agent-Based Approach to Business Fluctuations. New Economic Windows. Springer. Retrieved from http://www.myilibrary.com?id=192087
  • [13] Goodwin, R. M. (1967). A Growth Cycle. In Essays in Economic Dynamics (pp. 165–170). Palgrave Macmillan, London.
  • [14] Hodrick, R. J., & Prescott, E. C. (1997). Postwar U.S. Business Cycles: An Empirical Investigation. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 29, 1–16.
  • [15] Kaldor, N. (1975). Economic Growth and the Verdoorn Law--A Comment on Mr Rowthorn’s Article. The Economic Journal, 85, 891–896.
  • [16] Kalecki, M. (1971). Selected essays on the dynamics of the capitalist economy 1933-1970. Cambridge [England: University Press.
  • [17] Korotayev, A. V., & Tsirel, S. V. (2010). A Spectral Analysis of World GDP Dynamics: Kondratieff Waves, Kuznets Swings, Juglar and Kitchin Cycles in Global Economic Development, and the 2008–2009 Economic Crisis - eScholarship. Structure and Dynamics, 4.
  • [18] Krugman, P., & Venables, A. J. (1995). Globalization and the Inequality of Nations. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 857–880.
  • [19] La Marca, M. (2010). Real Exchange Rate, Distribution and Macro Fluctuations in Export-Oriented Economies. Metroeconomica, 61, 124–151.
  • [20] Lavopa, A., & Szirmai, A. (2014). Structural modernization and development traps : an empirical approach. UNU-Merit Working Papers.
  • [21] Lorenz, H.-W. (1989). Nonlinear dynamical economics and chaotic motion. Berlin; New York: Springer-Verlag.
  • [22] Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1977). In Search of a Useful Theory of Innovation. In Innovation, Economic Change and Technology Policies (pp. 215–245). Birkhäuser, Basel.
  • [23] Ocampo, J. A. (2011). Balance of payments dominance: its implications for macroeconomic policy. Retrieved from http://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/dspace/handle/10438/16268
  • [24] Prebisch, R. (1950). The economic development of Latin America and its principal problems. Lake Success: United Nations Dept. of Economic Affairs.
  • [25] Schumpeter, J. A. (1939). Business Cycles: A theoretical, historical and statistical analysis of the Capitalist process. Retrieved from http://libarch.nmu.org.ua/handle/GenofondUA/20647
  • [26] Silverberg, G., & Verspagen, B. (1995). An evolutionary model of long term cyclical variations of catching up and falling behind. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 5, 209–227.
  • [27] Steindl, J. (1952). Maturity and stagnation in American capitalism. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • [28] Szirmai, A. (2012). Industrialisation as an engine of growth in developing countries, 1950–2005. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 23, 406–420.
  • [29] Taylor, L. (1983). Structuralist macroeconomics: applicable models for the Third World. New York: Basic Books.
  • [30] Thirlwall, A. P. (1979). The balance of payments constraint as an explanation of the international growth rate differences. PSL Quarterly Review, 32.
  • [31] Verspagen, B. (1991). A new empirical approach to catching up or falling behind. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 2, 359–380.
Como citar:

Spinola, Danilo Sartorello; "The La Marca Model Revisited: Structuralist Goodwin Cycles with Evolutionary Supply Side and Balance of Payments Constraints", p. 265-273 . In: Anais do IV Encontro Nacional de Economia Industrial e Inovação. São Paulo: Blucher, 2019.
ISSN 2357-7592, DOI 10.5151/iv-enei-2019-1.3-074

últimos 30 dias | último ano | desde a publicação


downloads


visualizações


indexações