Artigo completo - Open Access.

Idioma principal

Research infrastructures in developing countries: The Brazilian case

Caliari, Thiago; Rapini, Márcia Siqueira; Chiarini, Tulio;

Artigo completo:

High quality research infrastructure is required to conduct S&T activities which may help to address national challenges and contribute to innovation processes. Given this, an exhaustive survey conducted by the Brazilian Institute of Applied Economic Research (Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada – IPEA) was undertaken to diagnose the current research infrastructure situation in Brazil. Using this data, the present paper provides information that allows us to yield new insights based on the peculiarities of the research infrastructure in Brazil, complementing the studies already present in the literature. Two econometric models – Logit and Probit – were used to “measure” the relative modernity of the research infrastructure in the country. We test the impact of variables frequently present in innovation studies – lab size, S&T production scale and scope, lab longevity and interactions with other labs and profit-seeking firms. We found that scaling up, modernizing and interacting with other agents of the Innovation System increase the chances of a research infrastructure to be considered “advanced”.

Artigo completo:

Palavras-chave: research infrastructure, innovation system, S&T public policy, Brazil,

Palavras-chave:

DOI: 10.5151/iv-enei-2019-6.2-069

Referências bibliográficas
  • [1] ACHARYA, T. Science and technology for wealth and health in developing countries. Global Public Health, v. 2, n. 1, p. 53–63, 2007.
  • [2] ALBUQUERQUE, E.; SIMOES, R.; BAESSA, A.; CAMPOLINA, B.; SILVA, L.. A distribuição da produção científica e tecnológica brasileira: uma descrição de estatística de produção local de patentes e artigos científicos. Revista Brasileira de Inovação, v. 1, 2002, p. 225-51.
  • [3] BARUFI, A. M. B. Impactos do Acesso ao Ensino Superior sobre a Migração de Estudantes Universitários. In: RESENDE, G. M. (Org.). . Avaliação de Políticas Públicas no Brasil uma análise de seus impactos regionais. 1. ed. Brasília: IPEA, 2014. v. 1. p. 307–352.
  • [4] BERNARDES, A.T.; ALBUQUERQUE, E.M. Cross-over, thresholds, and interactions between science and technology: lessons for less-developed countries. Research Policy, v. 32, p. 865-885, 2003.
  • [5] BRASIL. MINISTÉRIO DA EDUCAÇÃO. A democratização e expansão da educação superior no Brasil: 2003-2014. . [S.l: s.n.], 201 Disponível em: .
  • [6] BROOKS, H. The relationship between science and technology. Research Policy, v.23, p.477-486, 1994.
  • [7] CALIARI, T.; RAPINI, M. S. Geographical distance differentials in university-firm interaction in Brazil: A focus on the characteristics of agents and interactions. Nova Economia, v. 27, n. 1, 201
  • [8] CALIARI, T.; SANTOS, U. P. DOS; MENDES, P. S. Geração de Tecnologia em Universidades / Institutos de Pesquisa e a Importância da Interação com Empresas: Constatações através da Base de Dados dos Grupos de Pesquisa do CNPq. Análise Econômica, v. 34, n. 66, p. 285–312, 2016.
  • [9] CASSIOLATO, J. E., SOARES. M. C. C. Innovation Systems, Development and Health. In: CASSIOLATO, J. E; SOARES, M. C. Health Innovation Systems, Equity and Development, 2015
  • [10] CARVALHO, L. A valsa brasileira. São Paulo, São Paulo: Todavia Livros, 2018.
  • [11] CAVALCANTE, L. R. Desigualdades Regionais em Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação no Brasil: Uma Análise de sua Evolução Recente. , Texto para Discussão., no 1574. Brasília: [s.n.], 20 Disponível em: . Acesso em: 28 mar. 2018.
  • [12] CHANDLER, A. Scale and Scope: the Dynamic of Industrial Capitalism. Cambridge, MA: The Belknapp Press of the Harvard University Press, 1994.
  • [13] CHIARINI, T.; OLIVEIRA, V. P.; DO COUTO E SILVA NETO, F. C. Spatial distribution of scientific activities: An exploratory analysis of Brazil, 2000–10. Science & Public Policy, v. 41, pp. 625–640, 20
  • [14] COCKBURN, I. M.; HENDERSON, R. M. Scale and scope in drug development: unpacking the advantages of size in pharmaceutical research. Journal of Health Economics, v. 20, p. 1033–1057, 2001.
  • [15] COHEN, J. E. Publication rate as a function of laboratory size in a biomedical research institution. Scientometrics, v. 2, n. 1, p. 35–52, 1980.
  • [16] COHEN, J. E. Size, age and productivity of scientific and technical research groups. Scientometrics, v. 20, n. 3, p. 395–416, 1991.
  • [17] COHEN, W. M. et al. Links and Impacts : The Influence of Public Research on Industrial R&D. Management Science, v. 48, n. 1, p. 1–23, 2002.
  • [18] COOKE, P. Regional Innovation Systems, Clusters, and the Knowledge Economy. Industrial and Corporate Change, v. 10, n. 4, p. 945–974, 2001.
  • [19] CROW, M.; BOZEMAN, B. Limited by design: R&D Laboratories in the US National Innovation System. New York: Columbia University Press, 1998.
  • [20] DEL BO, C. F., FLORIO, M., & FORTE, S. (2016). The social impact of research infrastructures at the frontier of science and technology: The case of particle accelerators. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 112, 1–3.
  • [21] DE NEGRI, F.; CAVALCANTE, L. R.; ALVES, P. F.. Relações universidade-empresa no Brasil: o papel da infraestrutura pública de pesquisa. Discussing Paper, n. 1901. Brasília: IPEA, 2013.
  • [22] DE NEGRI, F.; SQUEFF, F. DE H. S. Sistemas setoriais de inovação e infraestrutura de pesquisa no Brasil. 1. ed. Brasília: IPEA, 2016.
  • [23] D’IPPOLITO; RÜLLING, C-C.. Research collaboration in large scale research infrastructures: collaboration types and policy implications. Research Policy, 2019.
  • [24] EC. European Commission. A vision for strengthening world-class research infrastructures in the ERA. Report of the expert group on research infrastructures. Brussels: European Commission, 2010.
  • [25] FAGUNDES, M. E. M.; CAVALCANTE, L. R. M. T.; RAMACCIOTTI, R. E. L. Distribuição regional dos fluxos de recursos federais para ciência e tecnologia. Parcerias Estratégicas, v. 10, n. 21, p. 59–78, 2005. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 2 abr. 2019.
  • [26] FLORIDA, R. Toward the Learning Region. Futures, v. 27, n. 5, p. 527–536, 1995.
  • [27] FORAY, D. The economic of knowledge, MIT Press, 2004.
  • [28] FORAY, D. Knowledge Policy for Development. In: KRAEMER-MBULA, E.; WAMAE, W. (Org.). . Innovation and the Development Agenda. Ottawa: OECD Publishing, 2010. p. 91–109.
  • [29] FREEMAN, C. Economics of Innovation. London: Routledge, 1992.
  • [30] FREEMAN, C. Technological infrastructure and international competitiveness. Industrial & Corporate Change, v. 13, n. 3, p.541-569, 2004.
  • [31] GUIMARÃES, R. Pesquisa no Brasil: a reforma tardia. São Paulo em Perspectiva, v.16, n. 4, p. 41-72, 2002.
  • [32] HERNANDEZ-VILLAFUERTE, K. et al. Economies of scale and scope in publicly funded biomedical and health research: evidence from the literature. Health Research Policy and Systems, v. 15, n. 3, p. 1–17, 2017. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 20 mar. 2018.
  • [33] JOHNES, J.; JOHNES, G. Costs, Eficciency and Economies of Scale and Scope in the English Higher Education Sector. . [S.l: s.n.], 2016. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 21 mar. 2018.
  • [34] KANNEBLEY, S.; BORGES, R. DE L. A.; DE PRINCE, D. Scientific production and its collective determinants: An econometric analysis for the Brazilian research labs. Science and Public Policy, v. 45, n. 5, p. 661–672, 2018.
  • [35] KIM, L. Imitation to innovation: the dynamics of Korea’s technological learning. Harvard Business School Press, 1997.
  • [36] KLEVORICK, A. K. et al. On the sources and significance of interindustry differences in technological opportunities. Research Policy, v. 24, p. 185–205, 1995.
  • [37] KLINE, S. J.; ROSENBERG, N. An Overview of Innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, v. 38, p. 275–305, 1986.
  • [38] KOSHAL, R. K.; KOSHAL, M. Economies of scale and scope in higher education: a case of comprehensive universities. Economics of Education Review, v. 18, p. 269–277, 1999. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 21 mar. 2018.
  • [39] LEE, K. The art of economic catch-up. Barriers, detours and leapfrogging in Innovation Systems. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2019.
  • [40] LOZANO, S.; RODRÍGUEZ, X-P.; ARENAS, A.. Atapuerca: evolution of scientific collaboration in an emergent large-scale research infrastructure. Scientometrics, 2014.
  • [41] LUNDVALL, B-A. National Systems of Innovation. Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London: Pinter Publisher, 1992.
  • [42] LUNDVALL, B-A., JOSEPH, K.J., CHAMINADE, C., AND VANG, J., eds, Handbook of Innovation Systems and Developing Countries: Building Domestic Capabilities in a Global Setting, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2009.
  • [43] MACULAN, A. M.; MELLO, J. M. C. University start-ups for breaking lock-ins of the Brazilian economy. Science and Public Policy, v. 36, n. 2, 2009.
  • [44] MANSFIELD, E. Academic research and industrial innovation. Research Policy, v. 20, p. 1–12, 1991. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 26 maio 2017.
  • [45] MAZZOLENI, R.; NELSON, R. The roles of research at universities and public labs in economic catch up. Laboratory of Economics and Management Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies.Pisa, 2005.
  • [46] MYRDAL, G. Teoria econômica e regiões subdesenvolvidas. (Edição Or ed. Belo Horizonte: Editora UFMG, 1960.
  • [47] NELSON, R. National innovation systems: a comparative analysis. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993.
  • [48] OECD. Establishing large international research infrastructures: Issues and options. Report of the Global Science Forum, 2010.
  • [49] OLIVARES, M.; WETZEL, H. Competing in the higher education market: Empirical evidence for economies of scale and scope in German higher education institutions. , University of Lüneburg Working Paper Series in Economics., no 223. Lüneburg: [s.n.], 2011.
  • [50] PAVITT, K. (1991) What makes basic research economically useful. Research Police, v.20, pp. 109-119.
  • [51] PEREZ, C.; SOETE, L. "Catching up in technology: entry barriers and windows of opportunity". In G.DOSI ET AL. eds. Technical Change and Economic Theory, London: Francis Pinter, pp. 458-479, 1988.
  • [52] PIRES, A. C.; SILVA, M. C. P. Políticas de Regionalização da Capes: Limites e Potencialidades para a história da educação superior no Norte e Nordeste do Brasil. 2009, Uberlândia: [s.n.], 2009.
  • [53] QIAO, L., MU, R., & CHEN, K. Scientific effects of large research infrastructures in China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 112, 102–112, 2016.
  • [54] QURASHI, M. M. Publication Rate as a function of the Laboratory / Group Size. Scientometrics, v. 6, n. 1, p. 19–26, 1984.
  • [55] RAPINI, M. S. Interação Universidade-Empresa no Brasil: Evidências do Diretório dos Grupos de Pesquisa do CNPq. Estudos Econômicos, v. 37, n. 1, p. 211–233, 2007. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 26 maio 2017.
  • [56] RIBEIRO, L. C.; RUIZ, R. M.; BERNARDES, A. T.; ALBUQUERQUE, E. M.. Modeling economic growth fuelled by science and technology. Estudos Econômicos, v. 40, n. 2, p. 319-340, 2010.
  • [57] RITTER, F. E.; SCHOOLER, L. J. The learning curve. International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Amsterdam: Pergamon, 2002. p. 8602–8605.
  • [58] ROSENBERG, N. Perspectives on technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1976.
  • [59] SANTOS, U. P.; CALIARI, T. Distribuição Espacial das Estruturas de Apoio às Atividades Tecnológicas no Brasil: Uma Análise Multivariada para as Cinquenta Maiores Microrregiões do País. Revista Economia (ANPEC), v. 13, n. 3b, p. 759–783, 2012.
  • [60] SALTER, A.; MARTIN, B. (2001) The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: a critical review. Research Policy, v.30, p.509-532.
  • [61] SCHWARTZMAN, S. A space for science. The development of the scientific community in Brazil. Pennsylvania: The Pennsylvania State University Press, 1991.
  • [62] SIDONE, O. J. G.; HADDAD, E. A.; MENA-CHALCO, J. P. A ciência nas regiões brasileiras: evolução da produção e das redes de colaboração. Transinformação, v. 28, n. 1, p. 15–31, 2016. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 2 abr. 2019.
  • [63] SILVA NETO, F. C. DO C. et al. Patterns of interaction between national and multinational corporations and Brazilian universities/public research institutes. Science and Public Policy, v. 40, p. 281–292, 2013. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 2 abr. 2019.
  • [64] SJOO, K.; HELLSTROM, T.. University-industry collaboration: a literature review and synthesis. Industry & Higher Education, 2019.
  • [65] SUZIGAN, W.; ALBUQUERQUE, E. The underestimated role of universities for the Brazilian system of innovation. Revista de Economia Política, v. 31, n. 401666, p. 3–30, 2011.
  • [66] VONORTAS, N. et al. Economies of scale and scope at the research project level. . Luxembourg: [s.n.], 2011. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 20 mar. 2018.
  • [67] VONORTAS, N. S. Scale and scope in research. In: DELANGHE, H.; MULDUR, U.; SOETE, L. (Org.). . European Science and Technology Policy: Towards Integration or Fragmentation? [S.l.]: Edward Elgar, 2009. p. 142–158.
  • [68] WOOLDRIDGE, J. M. Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2002.
  • [69] WRIGHT, M.; BIRLEY, S.; MOSEY, S. Entrepreneurship and University Technology Transfer. Journal of Technology Transfer, v. 29, p. 235–246, 2004.
Como citar:

Caliari, Thiago; Rapini, Márcia Siqueira; Chiarini, Tulio; "Research infrastructures in developing countries: The Brazilian case", p. 1166-1184 . In: Anais do IV Encontro Nacional de Economia Industrial e Inovação. São Paulo: Blucher, 2019.
ISSN 2357-7592, DOI 10.5151/iv-enei-2019-6.2-069

últimos 30 dias | último ano | desde a publicação


downloads


visualizações


indexações