Maio 2022 vol. 9 num. 1 - VI Encontro Nacional de Economia Industrial e Inovação

Artigo - Open Access.

Idioma principal | Segundo idioma

O Mercado de Educação Superior Público no Brasil: estrutura e conduta num mercado não-tradicional.

The Public Higher Education Market in Brazil: structure and conduct in a non-traditional market.

Freire, João ; Vasconcelos, Silvinha ; Vieira, Marcel ;

Artigo:

A educação superior é reconhecidamente importante para o desenvolvimento econômico e social de um país. Contudo, características intrínsecas ao produto educação superior e a consequente ação e presença do Estado no setor aumentam consideravelmente a complexidade de se analisar esta indústria. Neste contexto, o presente estudo objetivou analisar a concorrência no setor de educação superior pública no Brasil, com foco em instituições de alta qualidade, utilizando o modus operandi de autoridades antitruste ao redor do mundo. Especificamente, o mercado foi investigado em termos de suas características de estrutura e conduta. Os resultados mostram que instituições de educação superior (IESs) públicas enfrentam pressão competitiva de IESs particulares com qualidade elevada. Ademais, os mercados relevantes apresentam escopo geográfico mais amplo, com uma definição regional ou nacional, a depender da especificação de qualidade das instituições. No geral, os mercados não são concentrados e não geram preocupações anticompetitivas. Dentre as condutas praticadas pelas IESs, identificou-se que os processos seletivos independentes, a diferenciação de produto e a discriminação de preços são as ações mais relevantes e comuns entre instituições.

Artigo:

Higher education is extremely important for economic and social development. However, the higher education product has intrinsic traits that require State intervention in the sector, which hinders the analysis of the industry via traditional methods of the Economics discipline. This study aimed to carry out an analysis of competition in the Brazilian higher education sector, focusing on high quality institutions and using the modus operandi of antitrust authorities around the world as a baseline. Specifically, analytical techniques from the field of Industrial Organization have been employed to assess structure and conduct. Results showed that public higher education institutions (HEIs) face competitive pressure from high-quality private HEIs. Additionally, relevant markets present a wider scope, with either regional or national range, depending on schools’ quality. In general, markets are not concentrated and do not raise anticompetitive concerns. Independent admissions exams, product differentiation, and price discrimination were identified as the main conducts carried out by schools.

Download (PDF)

Palavras-chave: Educação superior; educação superior pública; concorrência no ensino superior; organização industrial e ensino superior,

Palavras-chave: Higher education; public higher education; competition in higher education; industrial organization and higher education,

DOI: 10.5151/vi-enei-826

Referências bibliográficas
  • [1] ABRAMOVITZ, M. Catching up, forging ahead, and falling behind. The Journal of Economic History, v. 46, n. 2, p. 385-406, 1986.
  • [2] AGRESTI, A. an introduction to categorical data analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1996.
  • [3] AGRESTI, A. Categorical data analysis. 2. ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2002.
  • [4] ALBRIEU, R. et al. Travesía 0: hacia la transformación industrial argentina. Nota Técnica no. IDB-TN-1672. Buenos Aires: Intal-BID, 2019.
  • [5] ALBRIEU, R. et al. Travesía 4.0: hacia la transformación industrial argentina. Buenos Aires: Intal-BID, 2022. Mimeo. Forthcoming.
  • [6] ANDREWS, D.; NICOLETTI, N.; TIMILIOTIS, C. Digital technology diffusion: a matter of capabilities, incentives or both? Working Papers, OECD, Economics Department, n. 1476, 2018.
  • [7] BAINES, T. et al. Servitization: revisiting the state-of-the-art and research priorities. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, v. 27, n. 2, p. 256-278, 201
  • [8] BALCER, Y.; LIPPMAN, S. A. Technological expectations and adoption of improved technology. Journal of Economic Theory, v. 34, p. 292-318, 1984.
  • [9] BRITTO, J.; URRACA-RUIZ, A.; FERRAZ, J. C.; TORRACCA, J.; SCHMIDT, H. El impacto de la digitalización sobre el empleo y las habilidades por estadios de adopción en Brasil y Argentina. Rio de Janeiro: IE-UFRJ; Campinas: IE-UNICAMP; Niteroi: FCC-UFF, 2022. Mimeo. Forthcoming.
  • [10] CANTNER, U.; VANNUCCINI, S. A new view of general-purpose technologies. Jena Economic Research Papers, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, n. 2012-054, 2017.
  • [11] CALVINO, F. et al. A taxonomy of digital intensive sectors. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, n. 2018/14. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2018.
  • [12] CETIC.BR - CENTRO REGIONAL DE ESTUDOS PARA O DESENVOLVIMENTO DA SOCIEDADE DA INFORMAÇÃO. ICT enterprises 2019. Survey on the use of information and communication technologies in Brazilian enterprises. São Paulo: Cetic.br, Nic.br, CGI.br, 2020.
  • [13] CHIAN, F. T. T. A perception-based model for technological innovation in small and medium enterprises. ECIS 2010 Proceedings, n. 33, 2010.
  • [14] COUTINHO, L. Digitalização, expectativas e dinamismo industrial: um mapa conceitual. Rio de Janeiro: IE-UFRJ; Campinas: IE-UNICAMP; Niteroi: FCC-UFF, 2022. Mimeo. Forthcoming.
  • [15] DOCAMPO RAMA, M.; RIDDER, H.; BOUMA, H. Technology generation and age in using layered user interfaces. Gerontechnology, v. 1, n. 1, January 2001.
  • [16] DOSI, G. Technological paradigms and technological trajectories. A suggested interpretation of the determinants and directions of technical change. Research Policy, v. 11, p. 147-162, 1982.
  • [17] DOSI, G.; NELSON, R. Technical change and industrial dynamics as evolutionary processes. In: HALL, B.; ROSENBERG, N. (Eds.) Handbook of the Economics of Technical Change. North Holland: Elsevier, 2010.
  • [18] EUROSTAT - STATISTICAL OFFICE OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Community survey on ICT usage (e-commerce) of enterprises 2002. Luxemburg: Eurostat, 20022
  • [19] EUROSTAT - STATISTICAL OFFICE OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Community survey on ICT usage and e-commerce in enterprises 2021. Luxemburg: Eurostat, 2021.
  • [20] FERRAZ, J. C.; KUPFER, D.; TORRACCA, J.; BRITTO, J. N. P. Snapshots of a state of flux: how Brazilian industrial firms differ in the adoption of digital technologies and policy implications. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, v. 23, n. 4, p. 390-407, 20
  • [21] FERRAZ, J. C.; RUSH, H.; MILES, I. Development, technology and flexibility: Brazil faces the Industrial Divide. London: Routledge, 1992.
  • [22] FREEMAN, C., PEREZ, C. Structural crises of adjustment: Business cycles and investment behavior. In: DOSI, G.; FREEMAN, R.; NELSON, R.; SILVERBERG, G.; SOETE, L. (Eds.). Technical change and economic theory. London: Pinter Publishing, 1988.
  • [23] GAMBARDELLA, A.; TORRISI, S. Does technological convergence imply convergence in markets? Evidence from the electronics industry. Research Policy, v. 27, p. 445-463, 1998.
  • [24] GREGORY, R. Knowledge in perception and illusion. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological, v. 352, n. 1358, p. 1121–1127, Aug. 29, 1997.
  • [25] IDG. 2019 Digital Business Survey. IDG Communications, Inc. 2019.
  • [26] IEL/CNI et al. Industry 2027: risks and opportunities for Brazil in the face of disruptive innovations. Final report: Building the Future of Brazilian Industry. Brasília, IEL/CNI. 2018.
  • [27] ITU-D - TELECOMMUNICATION DEVELOPMENT SECTOR. Partnership on Measuring ICT for Development. ITU-D, 2021.
  • [28] KOUL, S.; EYDGAHI, A. A systematic review of technology adoption frameworks and their applications. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, v. 12, n. 4, p. 106-112, 2017.
  • [29] KUPFER, D.; FERRAZ, J.C.; TORRACCA, J. A comparative analysis on digitalization in manufacturing industries in selected developing countries: Firm-level data on Industry 4.0. Working Paper 16/2019. Vienna: Department of Policy, Research and Statistics, UNIDO, 2019.
  • [30] LONG, J. S.; FREESE, J. Regression Models for categorical and limited dependent variables using Stata. 2. ed. College Station, Texas: Stata Press, 2006.
  • [31] LONG, J. S.; FREESE, J. Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata. 3. ed. College Station, TX: Stata Press, 2014.
  • [32] MCKINSEY. Transformações digitais no Brasil: Insights sobre o nível de maturidade digital das empresas no país. São Paulo: McKinsey Brasil, 2019.
  • [33] NELSON, R. Why do firms differ, and how does it matter? Strategic Management Journal, v. 12, p. 61-74, 1991,
  • [34] NELSON, R.; WINTER, S. G. An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982.
  • [35] NYLÉN, D.; HOLMSTROM, J. Digital innovation strategy: a framework diagnosing and improving digital product and service innovation. Business Horizons, v. 58, n. 1, p. 57-67, 2015.
  • [36] OECD/EUROSTAT. Oslo Manual 2018: Guidelines for Collecting, Reporting and Using Data on Innovation. 4. ed. Paris: OECD Publishing; Luxembourg: Eurostat, 2018.
  • [37] PFEIFFER, S. The vision of “Industrie 4.0” in the making – a case of future told, tamed, and traded. Nanoethics, v. 11, p. 107-121, 2017.
  • [38] PORTER, M.; HEPPELMANN, J. How smart, connected products are transforming competition. Harvard Business Review, nov. 2014.
  • [39] PWC. The Industry 4.0 / Digital Operations Self-Assessment. [On-line] PwC, 2021.
  • [40] ROGERS, E. M. Diffusion of innovations. 5. ed. New York: Free Press, 1910. [The Journal of Economic History, v. 23, p. 414-443, 2003]
  • [41] ROSENBERG, N. Inside the black box: technology and economics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1982.
  • [42] SEDB - SINGAPORE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BOARD. The Singapore Smart Industry Readiness Index: catalysing the transformation of manufacturing. Singapore: SEDB, 2017.
  • [43] SEDB - SINGAPORE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BOARD. The prioritisation matrix: catalysing the transformation of manufacturing. Singapore: SEBD, 2019.
  • [44] SCHACTER, D. Psychology. New York: Worth Publishers, 2011.
  • [45] SCHUMACHER, A.; SIHN, W. Development of a monitoring system for implementation of industrial digitalisation and automation using 143 key performance indicators. Procedia CIRP Conference on Manufacturing Systems, v. 93, p. 1310-1315, 2020.
  • [46] SILVA NETO, V. j., BONACELLI, M. B. M. AND PACHECO, C. A. O Sistema Tecnológico Digital: inteligência artificial, computação em Nuvem e Big Data. Revista Brasileira de Inovação. 2020.
  • [47] SOH P. Dominant design. In: AUGIER, M.; TEECE, D. (Eds.). The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Strategic Management. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016.
  • [48] UNCTAD - UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE ON TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT. Manual for the production of statistics on the digital economy. Geneva: UNCTAD, 2021.
  • [49] UNIDO - UNITED NATIONS INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION. Industrial Development Report. Vienna: UNIDO, 2020.
  • [50] VDMA. Guideline Industrie 4.0: Guiding principles for the implementation of Industrie 4.0 in small and medium sized businesses. VDMA, [s.d.].
  • [51] VERHOEF, P. C. et al. Digital transformation: a multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, v. 122, p. 889-901, 2021.
  • [52] ZOLAS, N. et al. Advanced technologies adoption and use by US firms: evidence from the annual business survey. CES 20-40. Suitland, MD: US Census Bureau, 2020.
  • [53] YU, J. Korea Smart Factory Initiative. In: COLLOQUIUM ON DIGITAL INDUSTRIAL POLICY PROGRAMME, South Africa, Nov. 2018.
Como citar:

Freire, João; Vasconcelos, Silvinha; Vieira, Marcel; "O Mercado de Educação Superior Público no Brasil: estrutura e conduta num mercado não-tradicional.", p. 216-236 . In: Anais do VI Encontro Nacional de Economia Industrial e Inovação (ENEI): “Indústria e pesquisa para Inovação: novos desafios ao desenvolvimento sustentável”. São Paulo: Blucher, 2022.
ISSN 2357-7592, DOI 10.5151/vi-enei-826

últimos 30 dias | último ano | desde a publicação


downloads


visualizações


indexações