. Acesso em 14/03/2022." />

Blucher Design Proceedings

Agosto 2023, vol.11, num.3 - ERGODESIGN & USIHC 2023 & JOP’Design 2023
Artigo - Open Access Idioma principal | Segundo principal

NPS e outras métricas para experiência do usuário: uma revisão sistemática de literatura

NPS and other metrics for user experience: a systematic literature review

Santos, Sergio Luiz Silvestre dos; liveira, André Ribeiro de

Artigo:

Este artigo, parte de uma pesquisa de mestrado, apresenta uma revisão sistemática da literatura sobre a adoção de métricas sumárias de experiência do usuário para softwares, calculadas através da coleta de dados autorreportados pelos usuários via questionários padronizados. Foram selecionados 20 estudos entre 225 trabalhos pré-selecionados nas bases escolhidas para consulta, os quais levaram à identificação de 39 métricas. O objetivo principal deste estudo é analisar, dentre as métricas sumárias de natureza quantitativa identificadas, aquelas que possam ser usadas como alternativas à métrica Net Promoter Score (NPS), muitas vezes adotada nas organizações para medir aspectos da experiência do usuário no uso dos softwares, em especial a usabilidade e seu componente satisfação do usuário. Como objetivos secundários este estudo visa a analisar a adequação da métrica NPS para a medição de fatores da experiência do usuário, discutir o uso de métricas sumárias para esta medição e apontar caminhos para futuras pesquisas.

This paper, part of a research for a master's degree, presents a systematic literature review (SLR) on the adoption of user experience summary metrics for software, calculated by collecting self-reported data from users via standardized questionnaires. Twenty studies were selected from 225 pre-selected papers in the bases chosen for consultation, which led to the identification of 39 metrics. The main objective of this study is to analyze, among the summary metrics of a quantitative nature identified, those that can be used as alternatives to the Net Promoter Score (NPS) metric, often adopted in organizations to measure aspects of user experience in the use of software, especially usability and its component user satisfaction. As secondary objectives this study aims to analyze the suitability of the NPS metric for measuring user experience factors, discuss the use of summary metrics for this measurement and point paths for future research.

Download (PDF)

Palavras-chave: None None

DOI: 10.5151/ergodesign2023-84

Referências bibliográficas
  • [1] "ALBERT, B.; TULLIS, T. Measuring the user experience. Collecting, Analyzing, and Presenting Usability Metrics. 2.ed. Maine, EUA: Morgan Kaufmann, 2013.
  • [2] ANDRESSEN, M. Why Software Is Eating the World. The Wall Street Journal, 2011. Disponível em <https://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424053111903480904576512250915629460>. Acesso em 07/03/2022.
  • [3] ASSILA, A.; DE OLIVEIRA, K. M.; EZZEDINE, H. Standardized Usability Questionnaires: Features and Quality Focus. Electronic Journal of Computer Science & Information Technology, University of Valenciennes, France, v. 6, n. 1, 2016.
  • [4] BROOKE, J. et al. SUS-A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability evaluation in industry, v. 189, n. 194, p. 4-7, 1996.
  • [5] FISHER, N. I.; KORDUPLESKI, R. E. Good and Bad Market Research: A Critical Review of Net Promoter Score. Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, [S.l.], v. 35, p. 1, 2019.
  • [6] GOUGH, D.; OLIVER, S.; THOMAS, J. An introduction to systematic reviews. 2.ed. United Kingdom, Sage, 2017.
  • [7] HAJESMAEEL-GOHARI, S. et al. The most used questionnaires for evaluating satisfaction, usability, acceptance, and quality outcomes of mobile health. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, [S.l.], v. 22, n. 1, p. 22, 2022.
  • [8] HASSENZAHL, M. User experience (UX): towards an experiential perspective on product quality. In: Proceedings of the 20th Conference on l'Interaction Homme-Machine. [S.l.]. p. 11-15, 2008.
  • [9] HINDERKS, A. et al. Developing a UX KPI based on the user experience questionnaire. Computer Standards & Interfaces, v. 65, p. 38-44, 2019
  • [10] HORNBÆK, K.; LAW, E. L. Meta-analysis of correlations among usability measures. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. 2007. p. 617-626.
  • [11] INAN NUR, A.; SANTOSO, H. B.; HADI PUTRA, P. O. The method and metric of user experience evaluation: a systematic literature review. In: 2021 10th International Conference on Software and Computer Applications. 2021. p. 307-317.
  • [12] INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR STANDARDIZATION. ISO 9241-11: 2018 Ergonomics of Human-System Interaction - Part 11: Usability: Definitions and Concepts. v. 9241, n. 11, 2018.
  • [13] INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR STANDARDIZATION. ISO 9241-210: 2019 Ergonomics of Human-System Interaction - Part 210: Human-centred design for interactive systems. v. 9241, 2019.
  • [14] IRIARTE, A. A., ERLE, G. L. Questionnaires for evaluation of user experience and usability in industrial environments: bibliographic review. DYNA New Technologies, January-December 2020, Bilbao, Spain, vol. 7, no. 1, [21 p], 2020.
  • [15] JOSHI, A.; SARDA, N. L.; TRIPATHI, S. Measuring effectiveness of HCI integration in software development processes. Journal of systems and software, v. 83, n. 11, p. 2045-2058, 2010.
  • [16] LACHNER, F. et al. Quantified UX: Towards a common organizational understanding of user experience. In: Proceedings of the 9th Nordic conference on human-computer interaction. Gothenburg, Sweden, p. 1-10, 2016.
  • [17] LIBÂNIO, C. de S.; FRANZATO, C.; Design Baseado em Evidências em organizações da saúde: uma revisão sistemática de literatura, p. 6034 . In: Anais do 13º Congresso Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento em Design (2018). São Paulo: Blucher, 2019.
  • [18] MAIA, C. L. B.; FURTADO, E. S. Uma revisão sistemática sobre medição da experiência do usuário. In: IHC'14: Simpósio Brasileiro sobre Fatores Humanos em Sistemas Computacionais, nº 3, 2014, Foz do Iguaçu. Sociedade Brasileira de Computação, 27 a 31 out. 2014. p. 369–372.
  • [19] MARQUES, L. C. UX-Tips: uma técnica de avaliação de user experience para aplicações de software. 2019. 166 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Informática) - Universidade Federal do Amazonas, Manaus, p. 47-73, 2019.
  • [20] MERHOLZ, P.; SKINNER, K. Org Design for Design Orgs: Building and Managing In-House Design Teams. Califórnia, EUA: O'Reilly Media, 2016.
  • [21] MOCZARNY, I. M.; DE VILLIERS, M. R.; VAN BILJON, J. A. How can usability contribute to user experience? A study in the domain of e-commerce. In: Proceedings of the South African Institute for Computer Scientists and Information Technologists Conference. Pretoria, South Africa. p. 216-225, 2012.
  • [22] MORVILLE, P. User experience honeycomb. Semantic Studios, 2004. Disponível em <https://semanticstudios.com/user_experience_design/> Acesso em 30/03/2022.
  • [23] NORMAN, J. The term ""UX"" [S.l.]: Norman Nielsen Group, 2016. 1 vídeo (1 min). Disponível em: < https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BdtGjoIN4E&list=PLqyH-0J7O6q_zEZHR4pM1u0LiG2jDVNP5&index=1>. Acesso em 14/03/2022.
  • [24] PARK, J. et al. Modeling user experience: A case study on a mobile device. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, [S.l.], v. 43, n. 2, p. 187-196, 2013.
  • [25] PERNICE, K. et al. The 6 Levels of UX Maturity. Nielsen Norman Group, 2021. Disponível em <https://www.nngroup.com/articles/ux-maturity-model/>. Acesso em 08/03/2022.
  • [26] REICHHELD, F. F. The one number you need to grow. Harvard business review, v. 81, n. 12, p. 46-55, 2003.
  • [27] RODDEN, K.; HUTCHINSON, H.; FU, X. Measuring the user experience on a large scale: user-centered metrics for web applications. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. Atlanta, USA. p. 2395-2398, 2010.
  • [28] ROTO, V.; RANTAVUO, H.; VÄÄNÄNEN-VAINIO-MATTILA, K. Evaluating user experience of early product concepts. In: Proc. DPPI. Compiegne, France. p. 199-208, 2009.
  • [29] SAURO, J.; KINDLUND, E.; A Method to Standardize Usability Metrics into a Single Score, p. 401-409. In: Proceedings of the Conference in Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2005) (2005). Portland, OR., EUA, 2 a 7 de abril. 2005. p. 401-409.
  • [30] SAURO, J.; LEWIS, J. R. Correlations among prototypical usability metrics: evidence for the construct of usability. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. Massachusetts, USA. p. 1609-1618. 2009.
  • [31] SAURO, J.; LEWIS, J. R. Quantifying the user experience: Practical statistics for user research. 2.ed. Cambridge: Morgan Kaufmann, 2016.
  • [32] SSEMUGABI, S.; DE VILLIERS, M. R. Make your choice: Dimensionality of an open integrated conceptual model for evaluating E-service quality, usability and user experience (e-SQUUX) of Web-based applications. In: Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists. 2016. Johannesburg, South Africa. p. 1-10, 2016.
  • [33]
  • [34] WALLACH, D.; CONRAD, J.; STEIMLE, T. The UX metrics table: A missing artifact. In: Design, User Experience, and Usability: Theory, Methodology, and Management: 6th International Conference, DUXU 2017, Held as Part of HCI International 2017, Vancouver, BC, Canada, July 9-14, 2017, Proceedings, Part I 6. Springer International Publishing, 2017. p. 507-517."
  • [35]
Como citar:

Santos, Sergio Luiz Silvestre dos; liveira, André Ribeiro de; "NPS e outras métricas para experiência do usuário: uma revisão sistemática de literatura", p-1292-1305. In: Anais do ERGODESIGN & USIHC 2023 & JOP’Design 2023. São Paulo: Blucher, 2023.
ISSN 23186968, DOI 10.5151/ergodesign2023-84

últimos 30 dias

79
downloads

1
visualizações

4
indexações