Artigo completo - Open Access.

Idioma principal | Segundo idioma

Horizontal Merger and Upward Pricing Pressure in a Bertrand-Cournot Model

Horizontal Merger and Upward Pricing Pressure in a Bertrand-Cournot Model

Huamani, Williams ; Cardoso, Leonardo C. B. ; Braga, Marcelo José ; Profeta, Graciela A. ; Bussmann, Tanise B. ;

Artigo completo:

The upward pricing pressure (UPP) proposed by Farrell and Shapiro (2010a) is a significant advance in the horizontal merger literature and practice. However, the indicator is designed for a particular pre-merger scenario: the Bertrand-type competition. Here, we propose an indicator for a Bertrand-Cournot duopoly pre-merger scenario, shedding light on this assumption’s role in the UPP. Besides, we assess the effect of the degree of product differentiation on UPP. Results indicated that the upward pricing pressure caused by a merger depends on the pre-merger competition, with the Bertrand-Cournot having a higher UPP than the Bertrand scenario. The degree of product differentiation also matters for the UPP – merged firms that produce more homogeneous products have a higher probability of causing upward pricing pressure in post-merger. Our findings help the antitrust authority analyze firms’ mergers, indicating that these two features need to be better observed: the pre-merger competition scenario and firms’ product differentiation.

Artigo completo:

The upward pricing pressure (UPP) proposed by Farrell and Shapiro (2010a) is a significant advance in the horizontal merger literature and practice. However, the indicator is designed for a particular pre-merger scenario: the Bertrand-type competition. Here, we propose an indicator for a Bertrand-Cournot duopoly pre-merger scenario, shedding light on this assumption’s role in the UPP. Besides, we assess the effect of the degree of product differentiation on UPP. Results indicated that the upward pricing pressure caused by a merger depends on the pre-merger competition, with the Bertrand-Cournot having a higher UPP than the Bertrand scenario. The degree of product differentiation also matters for the UPP – merged firms that produce more homogeneous products have a higher probability of causing upward pricing pressure in post-merger. Our findings help the antitrust authority analyze firms’ mergers, indicating that these two features need to be better observed: the pre-merger competition scenario and firms’ product differentiation.

Palavras-chave: ,

Palavras-chave: Product differentiation; Bertrand-Cournot model; Horizontal merger; Upward pricing pressure.,

DOI: 10.5151/v-enei-704

Referências bibliográficas
  • [1] Affeldt, P., Filistrucchi, L., Klein, T.J., 2013. Upward pricing pressure in two-sided markets.
  • [2] The Economic Journal 123, F505–F523.
  • [3] Affeldt, P., Filistrucchi, L., Klein, T.J., 2018. Upward pricing pressure in two-sided markets:
  • [4] Corrigendum. The Economic Journal 128, 1331–1332.
  • [5] Bjornerstedt, J., Verboven, F., 2016. Does merger simulation work? evidence from the swedish
  • [6] analgesics market. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 8, 125–64.
  • [7] Cheung, L., 2016. An empirical comparison between the upward pricing pressure test and merger
  • [8] simulation in differentiated product markets. Journal of Competition Law & Economics
  • [9] 12, 701–734.
  • [10] Cosnita-Langlais, A., Johansen, B.O., Sørgard, L., . Upward pricing pressure in two-sided
  • [11] markets: Incorporating rebalancing effects. International Journal of Industrial Organization
  • [12] 74, 102692.
  • [13] Cosnita-Langlais, A., Johansen, B.O., Sorgard, L., et al., 2018. Upward price pressure in twosided
  • [14] markets: Incorporating feedback effects. EconomiX-UMR7235, Universit´e Paris Nanterre.
  • [15] Dixit, A., 1979. A model of duopoly suggesting a theory of entry barriers. The Bell Journal of
  • [16] Economics , 20–32.
  • [17] Dutra, J., Sabarwal, T., 2020. Antitrust analysis with upward pricing pressure and cost efficiencies.
  • [18] PloS one 15, e02274
  • [19] Epstein, R.J., Rubinfeld, D.L., 2010. Understanding upp. The BE Journal of Theoretical Economics
  • [20] 10.
  • [21] Farrell, J., Shapiro, C., 2010a. Antitrust evaluation of horizontal mergers: An economic alternative
  • [22] to market definition. The BE Journal of Theoretical Economics 10.Farrell, J., Shapiro, C., 2010b. Upward pricing pressure in horizontal merger analysis: Reply to
  • [23] epstein and rubinfeld. The BE Journal of Theoretical Economics 10.
  • [24] Garmon, C., 2017. The accuracy of hospital merger screening methods. The RAND Journal of
  • [25] Economics 48, 1068–1102.
  • [26] Hotelling, H., 1929. Stability in competition. Economic Journal , 41–57.
  • [27] Miller, N.H., Remer, M., Ryan, C., Sheu, G., 2017. Upward pricing pressure as a predictor of
  • [28] merger price effects. International Journal of Industrial Organization 52, 216–247.
  • [29] Moresi, S., 2010. The use of upward price pressure indices in merger analysis. The Antitrust
  • [30] Source 9, 8–9.
  • [31] Neurohr, B., 2017. Critical efficiencies as upward pricing pressure with feedback effects. The
  • [32] BE Journal of Theoretical Economics 19.
  • [33] Oldale, A., Padilla, J., 2013. Eu merger assessment of upward pricing pressure: Making sense
  • [34] of upp, guppi, and the like. Journal of European Competition Law & Practice 4, 375–381.
  • [35] Pontual Ribeiro, E., Golovanova, S., 2020. A unified presentation of competition analysis in
  • [36] two-sided markets. Journal of Economic Surveys 34, 548–571.
  • [37] Salop, S.C., 1979. Monopolistic competition with outside goods. The Bell Journal of Economics
  • [38] , 141–156.
  • [39] Salop, S.C., Moresi, S., 2009. Updating the merger guidelines: comments. Georgetown Law
  • [40] Journal .
  • [41] Wiethaus, L., Nitsche, R., 2014. Upward pricing pressure analysis: Critical issues in recent
  • [42] applications. Journal of Theoretical Economics 1, 39.
  • [43] Willig, R., 2011. Unilateral competitive effects of mergers: Upward pricing pressure, product
  • [44] quality, and other extensions. Review of Industrial Organization 39, 19.
  • [45] Young, R., Crews, W., 2019. The case against antitrust law: Ten areas where antitrust policy
  • [46] can move on from the smokestack era. Competitive Enterprise Institute .
Como citar:

Huamani, Williams; Cardoso, Leonardo C. B.; Braga, Marcelo José; Profeta, Graciela A.; Bussmann, Tanise B.; "Horizontal Merger and Upward Pricing Pressure in a Bertrand-Cournot Model", p. 1300-1310 . In: Anais do V Encontro Nacional de Economia Industrial e Inovação (ENEI): “Inovação, Sustentabilidade e Pandemia”. São Paulo: Blucher, 2021.
ISSN 2357-7592, DOI 10.5151/v-enei-704

últimos 30 dias | último ano | desde a publicação


downloads


visualizações


indexações