.Acesso em: 3 Mai 2019." />

Blucher Engineering Proceedings

Novembro 2019, vol.2, num.6 - 12º Congresso Brasileiro de Inovação e Gestão de Desenvolvimento de Produto
Article - Open Access Idioma principal | Segundo principal

ENGAJAMENTO CORPORATIVO COM STARTUPS: SÍNTESE E ANÁLISE CRÍTICA DA LITERATURA

-

Bagno, Raoni Barros; Salerno, Mario Sergio; Souza Junior, Wesley Canedo de

Article:

Engajamento Corporativo com Startups (ECcS) se trata de uma iniciativa de inovação aberta em que grandes empresas interagem com startups visando melhoria de desempenho em inovação. Complementaridades entre empresas de grande porte (e.g. disponibilidade de recursos, inércia para inovar...) e startups (escassez de recursos, flexibilidade, tecnologias de ponta...) estão na base destes engajamentos. Contudo, grandes empresas e startups possuem diferenças marcantes, de forma que o trabalho conjunto entre elas traz muitos desafios e, especialmente para a grande empresa, muitas questões internas à organização emergem ao se buscar interagir com um negócio nascente (e.g. processos, aspectos culturais, compartilhamento de recursos e informação protegida, etc.). O debate corrente na temática de ECcS negligencia, em grande extensão, a complexidade subjacente aos elementos internos à grande organização para propiciar engajamentos efetivos com startups. Estudos que tangenciam a questão se limitam frequentemente a mencionar um Champion que atue expandindo limites organizacionais, dando suporte ao trabalho com startups. Dessa forma, o presente estudo sintetiza as abordagens da atual literatura sobre ECcS, identificando seus antecedentes e vertentes principais. Na sequência, o texto aborda a lacuna entre o debate corrente e as questões organizacionais no campo da gestão da inovação, levantando implicações e direções para estudos em ECcS.

-

Download (PDF)

Palavras-chave:

DOI: 10.5151/cbgdp2019-59

Referências bibliográficas
  • [1] ADAMS, R.; BESSANT, J.; PHELPS, R. Innovation management measurement: A review. International Journal of Management Reviews, v. 8, n. 1, p. 21-47, 2006.
  • [2] ALÄNGE, S.; STEIBER, A. Three operational models for ambidexterity in large corporations. Triple Helix, v. 5, n. 1, p. 5, 2018.
  • [3] ARENA, M.; CROSS, R.; SIMS, J.; UHL-BIEN, M. How to catalyze innovation in your organization. MIT Sloan Management Review, v. 58, n. 4, p. 38-48, 2017.
  • [4] BAGNO, R.B.; SALERNO, M.S.; AMATO NETO, J.; SILVA, D. Innovation and technological competence building in Brazilian automotive industry subsidiaries from the perspective of interorganizational networks. Proceedings of the 20th International GERPISA Colloquium, Krakow, 2012.
  • [5] BAGNO, R.B.; SALERNO, M.S.; DIAS, A.V.C. Innovation as a new organizational function: evidence and characterization from large industrial companies in Brazil. Production, v. 27, 2017.
  • [6] BAGNO, R.B.; SALERNO, M.S.; SILVA, D.O. Models with graphical representation for innovation management: a literature review. R&D Management, v. 47, n. 4, p. 637-653, 2017.
  • [7] BASU, S.; PHELPS, C.; KOTHA, S. Towards understanding who makes corporate venture capital investments and why. Journal of Business Venturing, v. 26, n. 2, p. 153-171, 2011.
  • [8] CHESBROUGH, H. Open Innovation: the New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2003.
  • [9] CHIARONI, D.; CHIESA, V.; FRATTINI, F. The Open Innovation Journey: How firms dynamically implement the emerging innovation management paradigm. Technovation, v. 31, n. 1, p. 34-43, 2011.
  • [10] DUNCAN, R.B. The ambidextrous organization: Designing dual structures for innovation. The management of organization, v. 1, p. 167-188, 1976.
  • [11] FREEMAN, J.; ENGEL, J.S. Models of innovation: Startups and mature corporations. California Management Review, v. 50, n. 1, p. 94-119, 2007.
  • [12] FREYTAG, R. Strategic negotiations: three essentials for successful partnerships with startups. Strategy & Leadership, v. 47, n. 1, p. 19-25, 2019.
  • [13] GREENWOOD, R.; MILLER, D. Tackling design anew: Getting back to the heart of organizational theory. Academy of Management Perspectives, v. 24, n. 4, p. 78-88, 2010.
  • [14] HOGENHUIS, B.N.; VAN DEN HENDE, E.A.; HULTINK, E.J. When Should Large Firms Collaborate with Young Ventures? Understanding young firms’ strengths can help firms make the right decisions around asymmetric collaborations. Research-Technology Management, v. 59, n. 1, p. 39-47, 2016.
  • [15] HUIZINGH, E.K. Open innovation: State of the art and future perspectives. Technovation, v. 31, n. 1, p. 2-9, 2011.
  • [16] HUMPHREY, J.; SCHMITZ, H. Governance and Upgrading in Global Value Chains, a background paper for the Bellagio Value Chain Workshop. IDS, University of Sussex, UK, 2000.
  • [17] INNOVATION LEADER. Startup engagement: best practices for large organizations (report excerpt). Innovation Leader, p.21. 2019
  • [18] KANBACH, D.K.; STUBNER, S. Corporate accelerators as recent form of startup engagement: The what, the why, and the how. Journal of Applied Business Research, v. 32, n. 6, p. 1761, 2016.
  • [19] KAPLAN, S. How Big Companies & Startups Use "Co-Creation" to Innovate. Inc. 2019 Disponível em: < https://www.inc.com/soren-kaplan/how-big-companies-amp-startups-use-co-creation-to-innovate.html >.Acesso em: 3 Mai 2019.
  • [20] KELLEY, D. Adaptation and organizational connectedness in corporate radical innovation programs. Journal of product innovation management, v. 26, n. 5, p. 487-501, 2009.
  • [21] KOHLER, T. Corporate accelerators: Building bridges between corporations and startups. Business Horizons, v. 59, n. 3, p. 347-357, 2016.
  • [22] LAWTON, J. What to expect from your corporate accelerator. Innovation Leader Pointers, n. June, p. 19-21, 2019.
  • [23] LIVIERATOS, A.D.; LEPENIOTIS, P. Corporate venture capital programs of European electric utilities: Motives, trends, strategies and challenges. The Electricity Journal, v. 30, n. 2, p. 30-40, 2017.
  • [24] MAHMOUD-JOUINI, S.B.; DUVERT, C.; ESQUIROL, M. Key Factors in Building a Corporate Accelerator Capability: Developing an effective corporate accelerator requires close attention to the relationships between startups and the sponsoring company. Research-Technology Management, v. 61, n. 4, p. 26-34, 2018.
  • [25] MELO, J.C.F.; BAGNO, R.B. Atribuições de um time dedicado à gestão da inovação em um grupo industrial brasileiro: um estudo longitudinal baseado em eventos. Revista Produção Online, v. 17, n. 2, p. 482-506, 2017.
  • [26] MINSHALL, T.; MORTARA, L.; VALLI, R.; PROBERT, D. Making “asymmetric” partnerships work. Research-Technology Management, v. 53, n. 3, p. 53-63, 2010.
  • [27] MINSKY, C. Big corporates are only interested in “innovation theatre”. Sifted 2019 Disponível em: < https://sifted.eu/articles/big-european-companies-startups-deloitte-survey/ >.Acesso em: 12 May 2019.
  • [28] O'CONNOR, G.C. Innovation: from process to function. Journal of product innovation management, v. 29, n. 3, p. 361-363, 2012.
  • [29] O'CONNOR, G.C.; CORBETT, A.C.; PETERS, L.S. Beyond the champion: institutionalizing innovation through people. Stanford University Press, 2018.
  • [30] O'CONNOR, G.C.; LEIFER, R.; PAULSON, A.S.; PETERS, L.S. Grabbing Lightning: Building a Capability for Breakthrough Innovation. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons, 2008. 332p.
  • [31] O'REILLY, C.A.; TUSHMAN, M.L. The ambidextrous organization. Harvard business review, v. 82, n. 4, p. 74, 2004.
  • [32] O'REILLY III, C.A.; TUSHMAN, M.L. Organizational ambidexterity: Past, present, and future. Academy of management Perspectives, v. 27, n. 4, p. 324-338, 2013.
  • [33] PRASHANTHAM, S.; KUMAR, K. Engaging with startups: MNC Perspectives. IIMB Management Review, 2019.
  • [34] PRASHANTHAM, S.; YIP, G.S. Engaging with startups in emerging markets. 2016.
  • [35] RAISCH, S.; BIRKINSHAW, J. Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. Journal of management, v. 34, n. 3, p. 375-409, 2008.
  • [36] RICHTER, N.; JACKSON, P.; SCHILDHAUER, T. Outsourcing creativity: An abductive study of open innovation using corporate accelerators. Creativity and Innovation Management, v. 27, n. 1, p. 69-78, 2018.
  • [37] SELIG, C.J.; GASSER, T.; BALTES, G.H. How Corporate Accelerators Foster Organizational Transformation: An Internal Perspective. p. 1-9, 2018.
  • [38] SHANKAR, R.K.; SHEPHERD, D.A. Accelerating strategic fit or venture emergence: Different paths adopted by corporate accelerators. Journal of Business Venturing, 2018.
  • [39] SPENDER, J.-C.; CORVELLO, V.; GRIMALDI, M.; RIPPA, P. Startups and open innovation: a review of the literature. European Journal of Innovation Management, v. 20, n. 1, p. 4-30, 2017.
  • [40] TIDD, J.; BESSANT, J.; PAVITT, K. Managing innovation integrating technological, market and organizational change. Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons, 2001.
  • [41] WEIBLEN, T.; CHESBROUGH, H.W. Engaging with startups to enhance corporate innovation. California Management Review, v. 57, n. 2, p. 66-90, 2015.
Como citar:

Bagno, Raoni Barros; Salerno, Mario Sergio; Souza Junior, Wesley Canedo de; "ENGAJAMENTO CORPORATIVO COM STARTUPS: SÍNTESE E ANÁLISE CRÍTICA DA LITERATURA", p-808-819. In: Anais do 12º Congresso Brasileiro de Inovação e Gestão de Desenvolvimento de Produto. São Paulo: Blucher, 2019.
ISSN 23577592, DOI 10.5151/cbgdp2019-59

últimos 30 dias

157
downloads

356
visualizações

927
indexações