Artigo - Open Access.

Idioma principal

Does public procurement for innovation increase innovative efforts? The case of Brazil

Rocha, Frederico;

Artigo:

The paperuses microdata from the Brazilian Innovation Survey (PINTEC) to assess theeffect of public procurement of innovation (PPI) on firms’ private R&Dexpenditures. The PINTEC 2014 edition allows the identification of those firmsthat participated in PPI programs. Using this information, the paper builds acontrol sample through coarsened exact matching and tests the effect of PPI onfirms private R&D to sales ratio. The results show that firms increasetheir R&D intensity between 3 and 6 percentage points, depending on thecontrols used in the tobit model. Data also shows that most firms involved inPPI are small and belong to low technology sectors. These features unshed animportant characteristic of PPI: its ability to target small firms andcontribute to local development.

Artigo:

Palavras-chave: public procurement of innovation; policy assessment; innovation policy; Brazil,

Palavras-chave: ,

DOI: 10.5151/enei2018-79

Referências bibliográficas
  • [1] ABDI. (2013). Mensuração e efetividade dos instrumentos de apoio à inovação no Brasil. Fonte: http://www.abdi.com.br/Estudo/Volume4.pdf. Arrow, K. (1962). Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention. Em NBER, The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors (pp. 609-626). Princeton: Princeton University Press. Fonte: http://www.nber.org/chapters/c2144 Block, F. (2008). Swimming against the current: The rise of a hidden developmental state in the United States. Politics and Society, 36(2), pp. 169-206. doi:10.1177/0032329208318731 Cassiolato, J. E., Lastres, H., & Maciel, M. (2003). Systems of Innovation and Development Evidence from Brazil. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Cunningham, P., Gök, A., & Laredo, P. (2012). The Impact of Direct Support to R&D and Innovation in Firms. Compendium of Evidence on the Effectiveness of Innovation Policy Intervention. Fonte: http://www.innovation-policy.org.uk/ de Sousa, R. A., & Oliveira, J. M. (2010). Compras Governamentais: Análise de Aspectos da Demanda Pública por Equipamentos de Telecomunicações. Radar, 10. IPEA. Edler, J., & Georghiou, L. (2007). Public procurement and innovation—Resurrecting the demand side. Research Policy, 36, pp. 949-973. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.03.003 Edler, J., Georghiou, L., Blind, K., & Uyarra, E. (2013). Evaluating the demand side: New challenges for evaluating. Research Evaluation, 21, pp. 33-47. doi:10. lÓ93/reseval/rvr002 Edquist, C., & Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, J. M. (2012). Public Procurement for Innovation as mission-oriented innovation policy. Research Policy, 41, pp. 1757-1769. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2012.04.022 Edquist, C., Hommen, L., & Tsipouri, L. (2000). Public Technology Procurement and Innovation. New York: Springer. Edquist, C., Vonortas, N., & Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, J. M. (2015). Introduction. Em C. Edquist, N. Vonortas, J. Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, & J. Edler, Public Procurement for Innovation (pp. 1-34). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Guerzoni, M., & Raitieri, E. (2015). Demand-side vs.supply-side technology policies: Hidden treatment and new empirical evidence in the product mix. Research Policy, 44, pp. 726-747. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2014.10.009 Iacus, S., King, G., & Porro, G. (2012). Causal inference without balance checking: Coarsened exact matching. Political Analysis, 20(1), pp. 1-24. doi:10.1093/pan/mpr013 King, G., & Nielsen, R. (2016). Why Propensity Scores Should not Be Used for Matching. Fonte: https://gking.harvard.edu/publications/why-propensity-scores-should-not-be-used-formatching Malerba, F., & Nelson, R. (2011). “Learning and Catching Up in Different Sectoral Systems: Evidence from Six Industries. Industrial and Corporate Change, 20(6), pp. 1645-1675. doi:10.1093/icc/dtr062 Mazzucato, M. (2011). The Entrepreneurial State. London: Demos. Pinto, A. (1970). Naturaleza e Implicaciones de la "Heterogeneidad Estructural" en America Latina. El Trimestre Económico, 37, pp. 83-100. Fonte: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20856116 Rauen, A. (2015). Compras públicas de P&D no Brasil: o uso do artigo 20 da Lei da Inovação. Radar, 40. Brasília: IPEA. Rauen, C. (2017). As Contratações de P&D para a Nova Fonte de Luz Sincroton Brasileira. Radar, 52. Fonte: http://www.ipea.gov.br/portal/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=30601 Ribeiro, C. G. (11-14 de 52 de 2017). Encomendas Tecnológicas Realizadas pela FAB: O Programa KC-390. Radar. Brasília: IPEA. Fonte: http://www.ipea.gov.br/portal/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=30601 Rocha, F. (2017). Procurement as innovation policy and its distinguishing effects on innovative efforts of the Brazilian oil and gas suppliers. Economics of Innovation and New Technology. doi:10.1080/10438599.2017.1408199 Rothwell. (1984). Technology-based small firms and regional innovation potential: the role of public procurement. Journal of Public Policy, 4(4), pp. 307-332. doi:10.1017/S0143814X00002774 Soares, R. P. (2005). Compras governamentais: características das firmas industriais e participação. Em J. A. DE NEGRI, & M. S. SALERNO, Inovações, padrões tecnológicos e desempenho das empresas brasileiras (pp. 299-234.). Brasília: IPEA. Squeff, F. d. (2014). O Poder de Compras Governamental como Instrumento de Desenvolvimento Tecnológico: O Caso Brasileiro. Textos para discussão do IPEA, 1922. IPEA. Fonte: http://www.ipea.gov.br/portal/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=21116 Stuart, E. (2010). Matching Methods for Causal Inference: A Review and a Look Forward. Statistical Science, 25(1), pp. 1-2 doi:10.1214/09-STS313 Uyarra, E. (2012). Review of Measures in Support of Public Procurement of Innovation. Compendium of Evidence on the Effectiveness of Innovation. Fonte: http://www.innovation-policy.org.uk/share/16_Review%20of%20Measures%20in%20Support%20of%20Public%20Procurement%20of%20Innovation.pdf Uyarra, E., & Flanagan , K. (s.d.). Understanding the Innovation Impacts of Public Procurement. European Planning Studies, 18(1), pp. 123-143. doi:10.1080/09654310903343567
Como citar:

Rocha, Frederico; "Does public procurement for innovation increase innovative efforts? The case of Brazil", p. 1441-1460 . In: . São Paulo: Blucher, 2018.
ISSN 2357-7592, DOI 10.5151/enei2018-79

últimos 30 dias | último ano | desde a publicação


downloads


visualizações


indexações