Cidade Dinâmica: Ferramentas digitais em prol do planejamento urbano

Cidade Dinâmica: Ferramentas digitais em prol do planejamento urbano

Caldeira, Keila Fernanda Gomes; Pinheiro, Rafael Lemieszek

Full Article:

Considering the variety of digital tools available nowadays and the growth of their possible uses in architecture and urbanism,, we propose to study their potential as auxiliary tools in the process of urban design, based on their ability to help understand and take part in complex projects that are currently out of reach, technically or literally, to the general population. This article analyzes the origins and the theoretical framework behind urban planning in the Brazilian contemporary cities, currently based on Euclidean Zoning, and the processes of connecting contributions from participatory process and digital tools into city-planning level decisions. attempting to have a closer look into the questions behind a new proposal of planning, on a non-euclidean way, where the urban parameters could be evaluated and defined individually for each plot, based on a set of parameters that vary gradually and are dynamic in nature.

Batty, M. (2013). The new science of cities. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press. Belo Horizonte. Região Metropolitana de Belo Horizonte. Manual Técnico de Edificações, 2012, PBH. Disponível em: http://www.pbh.gov.br/smaru/Manual_Tecnico_Edificacoes/Manual_Tecnico_Edificacoes_05_09_11.pdf Elliot, D. L. A Better Way to Zone: Ten Principles to Create More Livable Cities. Island Press, 2012, p. 15-39. Friedmann, J. Towards a non-euclidean mode of Planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 59, No 4, Outono 1993. American Planning Association, Chicago, IL, USA. Friedmann, J. The Good City: In Defense of Utopian Thinking. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research Volume 24.2 June 2000. Glanville, R. On being out of control, 2002 (não publicado). Jones, J. C. (1991). Part 2 Opus one, number two Designing designing, London: Architecture design and technology press (pp. 158–166). Kapp, S., & Baltazar, A. P. Por uma Arquitetura não Planejada: o arquiteto como designer de interfaces e o usuário como produtor de espaços. Impulso, Piracicaba, 17(44): 93-103, 2006. Monte-Mór, R. L. Planejamento urbano no Brasil; emergência e consolidação. Etc... espaço, tempo e crítica, vol. 1, nº1, 2007. Pask, G. The Architectural Relevance of Cybernetics. in: Architectural Design. Londres: Set/1969. Reno, R. R. Non-Euclidean Zoning: the Use of the Floating Zone, 23 Md. L. Rev. 105 (1963). Salomão, C. C. Arquitetura e Cibernética. Tese de doutorado - USP, São Paulo. 2006. Weinstock, M., Gharlrghi, & M. (July/August 2013) Intelligent Cities and the Taxonomy of Cognitive Scales. Architectural Design. Special Issue: System City: Infrastructure and the Space of Flows Volume 86 – Issue:4, p. 56–65,

Palavras-chave:

DOI: 10.5151/despro-sigradi2016-686

Referências bibliográficas

• [1]

Como citar:

Caldeira, Keila Fernanda Gomes; Pinheiro, Rafael Lemieszek; "Cidade Dinâmica: Ferramentas digitais em prol do planejamento urbano", p-544-549. In: <strong>XX Congreso de la Sociedad Iberoamericana de Gráfica Digital [=Blucher Design Proceedings, v.3 n.1]</strong>. São Paulo: Blucher, 2016.
ISSN 23186968, DOI 10.5151/despro-sigradi2016-686