Artigo Completo - Open Access.

Idioma principal

AVALIAÇÃO DE IDEIAS EM INICIATIVAS CROWDSOURCING PARA INOVAÇÃO: UM ESTUDO EXPLORATÓRIO

Gomes, Joade Cortez; González, Mario Orestes Aguirre; Fernandes, Marcela Squires Galvão; Rodrigues, Lucas Matheus; Ferreira, Janine Kharen de Lima; Nascimento, Bruno Colt Ferreira do; Silva, Técia de Lima; Vasconcelos, Rafael Monteiro de;

Artigo Completo:

O processo de crowdsourcing parte de um tema ou problema a ser resolvido pela organização, aberto à multidão que interage e participa do processo resolutivo por meio de ideias, submetendo-se ao final a um processo avaliativo no qual as melhores são selecionadas e implementadas. O desafio é a assertividade da seleção, principalmente quando há um alto volume de contribuições. O objetivo deste artigo é propor elementos para avaliação de ideias geradas a partir de uma abordagem crowdsourcing. Para isso, realizou-se uma revisão bibliográfica sistemática e, por meio de um estudo de caso, validou-se no Escritório de Ideias e Inovação da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte os elementos de avaliação de ideias: Filtro popular e técnico; Detalhamento das ideias; Avaliação final por multicritérios e análise consensual; e Fatores influenciadores.

Artigo Completo:

Palavras-chave: Escritório de Ideias, gerenciamento de ideias, criatividade coletiva, crowdsourcing, open innovation,

Palavras-chave:

DOI: 10.5151/cbgdp2017-096

Referências bibliográficas
  • [1] AMABILE, T. M. Componential Theory of Creativity (Working Paper No. 12096). 2012.
  • [2] BLAIR, C. S.; MUMFORD, M. D. Errors in idea evaluation: Preference for the unoriginal?.The journal of creative behavior, v. 41, n. 3, p. 197-222, 2007.
  • [3] BLOHM, I., RIEDL, C., LEIMEISTER, J. M., & KRCMAR, H.. Idea evaluation mechanisms for collective intelligence in open innovation communities: Do traders outperform raters?. In: Proceedings of 32nd International Conference on Information Systems. 2011.
  • [4] BLOHM, I., RIEDL, C., FÜLLER, J., & LEIMEISTER, J. M. . et al. Rate or Trade? Identifying Winning Ideas in Open Idea Sourcing. Information Systems Research, v. 27, n. 1, p. 27-48, 2016.
  • [5] BRABHAM, D. C. Crowdsourcing as a model for problem solving an introduction and cases. Convergence: the international journal of research into new media technologies, v. 14, n. 1, p. 75-90, 2008.
  • [6] ______. Crowdsourcing. Mit Press, 2013.
  • [7] CAROFF, X.; BESANÇON, M. Variability of creativity judgments. Learning and individual differences, v. 18, n. 4, p. 367-371, 2008.
  • [8] CHIU, C.; LIANG, T.; TURBAN, E. What can crowdsourcing do for decision support?. Decision Support Systems, v. 65, p. 40-49, 2014.
  • [9] CLUZEL, F. YANNOU, B., MILLET, D., LEROY, Y. Eco-ideation and eco-selection of R&D projects portfolio in complex systems industries. Journal of Cleaner Production, v. 112, p. 4329-4343, 2016.
  • [10] CORREA, C.H., FERREIRA D. M., A. Method for decision making in the management of innovation: criteria for the evaluations of ideas. In: Presented at the International Association for Management of Technology, pp. 2151e2169. 2015.
  • [11] CRESWELL, J. W. Projeto de pesquisa métodos qualitativo, quantitativo e misto. In: Projeto de pesquisa métodos qualitativo, quantitativo e misto. Artmed, 2010.
  • [12] CSIKSZENTMIHALYI, M. Edited extract from R. Sternberg (Ed)(1999). Handbook of creativity. 1999.
  • [13] ______. A systems perspective on creativity. London: Sage Publications, 2001.
  • [14] DEAN, D. L., HENDER, J. M., RODGERS, T. L., & SANTANEN, E. et al. Identifying quality, novel, and creative ideas: constructs and scales for idea evaluation. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 7, pp. 646-698, 2006.
  • [15] EBNER, W.; LEIMEISTER, J. M.; KRCMAR, H. Community engineering for innovations: the ideas competition as a method to nurture a virtual community for innovations. R&d Management, v. 39, n. 4, p. 342-356, 2009.
  • [16] ELING, K.; LANGERAK, F.; GRIFFIN, A. The performance effects of combining rationality and intuition in making early new product idea evaluation decisions. Creativity and Innovation Management, v. 24, n. 3, p. 464-477, 2015.
  • [17] EUBANKS, D. L.; MUMFORD, M. D. Leader errors and the influence on performance: An investigation of differing levels of impact. The Leadership Quarterly, v. 21, n. 5, p. 809-825, 2010.
  • [18] GABRIEL, A., CAMARGO, M., MONTICOLO, D., BOLY, V., & BOURGAULT, M. Improving the idea selection process in creative workshops through contextualisation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2016.
  • [19] GEIGER, D., ROSEMANN, M., FIELT, E., & SCHADER, M. et al. Crowdsourcing information systems-definition, typology and design. Thirty Third International Conference on Information Systems, Orlando, 2012.
  • [20] GIL, A. C. Como elaborar projetos de pesquisa. 4. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2009.
  • [21] GRAY, D.; BROWN, S.; MACANUFO, J. Gamestorming: A playbook for innovators, rulebreakers, and changemakers. O'Reilly Media, Inc., 2010.
  • [22] GUTIÉRREZ, E. Managing Ambiguity When Evaluating and Selecting New Ideas in Project Portfolio Management. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, v. 11, n. 05, p. 1450030, 2014.
  • [23] HAO, N., KU, Y., LIU, M., HU, Y., BODNER, M., GRABNER, R. H., & FINK, A. Reflection enhances creativity: Beneficial effects of idea evaluation on idea generation. Brain and cognition, v. 103, p. 30-37, 2016.
  • [24] HENNESSEY, B. A.; AMABILE, T. M. Consensual assessment. Encyclopedia of creativity, v. 1, p. 253-260, 2011.
  • [25] HERMAN, A.; REITER-PALMON, Roni. The effect of regulatory focus on idea generation and idea evaluation. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, v. 5, n. 1, p. 13, 2011.
  • [26] HOWE, J. Crowdsourcing: How the power of the crowd is driving the future of business. Random House, 2008.
  • [27] JAGPAT, S. et al. Interdependency between average novelty, individual average novelty, and variety. International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation, v. 3, n. 1, p. 43-60, 2015.
  • [28] KAHRAMAN, C.; BÜYÜKÖZKAN, G.; ATEŞ, N. Y. A two phase multi-attribute decision-making approach for new product introduction. Information Sciences, v. 177, n. 7, p. 1567-1582, 2007.
  • [29] KOBAYASHI, M. et al. Collaboration Support System for Analyzing Individual Differences Based on Designers’ Idea Evaluation. In: DS 58-5: Proceedings of ICED 09, the 17th International Conference on Engineering Design, Vol. 5, Design Methods and Tools (pt. 1), Palo Alto, CA, USA, 24.-27.08. 2009.
  • [30] KUDROWITZ, B. M.; WALLACE, D. Assessing the quality of ideas from prolific, early-stage product ideation. Journal of Engineering Design, v. 24, n. 2, p. 120-139, 2013.
  • [31] LIIKKANEN, L. A. et al. Quantitative evaluation of the effectiveness of idea generation in the wild. In: International Conference on Human Centered Design. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011. p. 120-129.
  • [32] MAGNUSSON, P. R.; NETZ, J.; WÄSTLUND, E. Exploring holistic intuitive idea screening in the light of formal criteria. Technovation, v. 34, n. 5, p. 315-326, 2014.
  • [33] ONARHEIM, B.; CHRISTENSEN, B. T. Distributed idea screening in stage-gate development process. Journal of Engineering Design, v. 23, n 9, p 660-673, 2012.
  • [34] REITER-PALMON, R.; ILLIES, J. J. Leadership and creativity: Understanding leadership from a creative problem-solving perspective. The Leadership Quarterly, v. 15, n. 1, p. 55-77, 2004.
  • [35] RIEDL, C. et al. The effect of rating scales on decision quality and user attitudes in online innovation communities. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, v. 17, n. 3, p. 7-36, 2013.
  • [36] RIETZSCHEL, E. F.; NIJSTAD, B. A.; STROEBE, Wolfgang. Productivity is not enough: A comparison of interactive and nominal brainstorming groups on idea generation and selection. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, v. 42, n. 2, p. 244-251, 2006.
  • [37] Rio Grande do Norte. Pró-Reitoria de Gestão de Pessoas da UFRN. Planejamento Estratégico. 2016. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 05 set. 2016.
  • [38] Rio Grande do Norte. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte. Plano de Desenvolvimento Institucional. 2016. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 04 set. 2016.
  • [39] Rio Grande do Norte. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte. Plano de Gestão. 2016. Disponível em: . Acesso em: 04 set. 2016.
  • [40] SAXTON, G. D.; OH, O.; KISHORE, R. Rules of crowdsourcing: Models, issues, and systems of control. Information Systems Management, v. 30, n. 1, p. 2-20, 2013.
  • [41] SOARES, A. V. A. Inovação no setor público: obstáculos e alternativas. 2009. Disponível em: www.administradores.com.br/. Acesso em 02. Jul 2015.
  • [42] TUNG, W.; YUAN, S.; TSAI, J. A custom collaboration service system for idea management of mobile phone design. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, v. 19, n. 5, p. 494-509, 2009.
  • [43] VERHAEGEN, P.; VANDEVENNE, D; PEETERS, J.; DUFLOU, J. Refinements to the variety metric for idea evaluation. Design Studies, v. 34, n. 2, p. 243-263, 2012.
  • [44] VON OECH, R. Um chute na rotina: os quatro papéis essenciais do processo criativo. São Paulo. Cultura editores associados, 1994.
  • [45] XIE, L.; ZHANG, P. Idea Management System for Team Creation. Journal of software, v. 5, n. 11, p. 1187-1194, 2010.
  • [46] YANG, Y. Open innovation contests in online markets: idea generation and idea evaluation with collective intelligence. Temple University Graduate Board. 2012.
  • [47] YIN, R. K. Estudo de Caso: Planejamento e Métodos. Bookman editora, 4. ed. Porto alegre: bookman. 2010.
Como citar:

Gomes, Joade Cortez; González, Mario Orestes Aguirre; Fernandes, Marcela Squires Galvão; Rodrigues, Lucas Matheus; Ferreira, Janine Kharen de Lima; Nascimento, Bruno Colt Ferreira do; Silva, Técia de Lima; Vasconcelos, Rafael Monteiro de; "AVALIAÇÃO DE IDEIAS EM INICIATIVAS CROWDSOURCING PARA INOVAÇÃO: UM ESTUDO EXPLORATÓRIO", p. 914-923 . In: . São Paulo: Blucher, 2017.
ISSN 2318-6968, DOI 10.5151/cbgdp2017-096

últimos 30 dias | último ano | desde a publicação


downloads


visualizações


indexações