Blucher Design Proceedings

Dezembro 2020, vol.8, num.4 - XXIV International Conference of the Iberoamerican Society of Digital Graphics
Conference full papers - Open Access Idioma principal | Segundo principal

A Teaching Methodology for Parametric Design: A Case Study with Parametric Bench

A Teaching Methodology for Parametric Design: A Case Study with Parametric Bench

Agirbas, Asli

Conference full papers:

In parametric design-oriented elective courses given in the architecture departments, most of the parametric designs generally remain at the modeling stage and cannot pass to the design application stage. In this study, this situation was determined as a research problem. Therefore, an experimental method within the scope of the parametric design course was considered. The applied method was discussed and the result product was evaluated. The applied method not only overcame the research problem, but also helped students to develop creativity and collaborative competency.

In parametric design-oriented elective courses given in the architecture departments, most of the parametric designs generally remain at the modeling stage and cannot pass to the design application stage. In this study, this situation was determined as a research problem. Therefore, an experimental method within the scope of the parametric design course was considered. The applied method was discussed and the result product was evaluated. The applied method not only overcame the research problem, but also helped students to develop creativity and collaborative competency.

Download (PDF)

Palavras-chave:

DOI: 10.5151/sigradi2020-99

Referências bibliográficas
  • [1] Agirbas, A. (2018). The Use of Metaphors as a Parametric Design Teaching Model: A Case Study. Design and Technology Education: an International Journal, 23 (1), 40-54.
  • [2] Aish, R. & Hanna, S. (2017). Comparative evaluation of parametric design systems for teaching design computation. Design Studies, 52, 144-172.
  • [3] Bhooshan, S. (2017). Parametric design thinking: A case-study of practice-embedded architectural research. Design Studies, 52, 115-143.
  • [4] Celani, G. & Verzola Vaz, C.E. (2012). CAD Scripting and Visual Programming Languages for Implementing Computational Design Concepts: A Comparison From A Pedagogical Point Of View. International Journal of Architectural Computing, 10, 121-138.
  • [5] Cross, N. (1982). Designerly ways of knowing. Design Studies. 3(4), 221-227.
  • [6] Cross, N. (2006). Designerly Ways of Knowing. London: Springer.
  • [7] Cross, N. (2011). Design Thinking. Oxford-New York: Berg.
  • [8] Do, E.Y.L., Gross, M.D., Neiman, B. & Zimring, C. (2001). Intentions in and relations among design drawings. Design Studies, 21 (5), 483-503.
  • [9] Fry, H., Ketteridge, S. & Marshall, S. (2009). A Handbook for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: Enhancing Academic Practice. London: Taylor and Francis group.
  • [10] Garner, S. (1992). The undervalued role of drawing in design. In
  • [11] D. Thistlewood (Ed), Drawing research and development (pp. 98–109). London: Longman.
  • [12] Goel, V. (1992). Ill-structured Representations for Ill-structured problems. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • [13] Goel, V. (1995). Sketches of thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • [14] Goldschmidt, G. & Smolkov, G. (2006). Variances in the impact of visual stimuli on design problem solving performance. Design Studies, 27(5), 549-569.
  • [15] Gross, M. & Do, E. Y. (1996). Ambiguous intentions: A paper-like interface for creative design. In Proceedings of the ACM UIST Conference (pp. 183-192).
  • [16] Kolb, D.A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as The Source of Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • [17] Oxman, R. (2017). Thinking difference: Theories and models of parametric design thinking. Design Studies, 52, 4-39.
  • [18] Parametric Bench. (2019). The assembly process of the bench https://youtu.be/IB8smOqhKcs (Accessed at 22 September 2020).
  • [19] Schnabel, M. A. (2012). Learning parametric designing. In Gu, N. and Wang, X. (Eds), Computational Design Methods and Technologies: Applications in CAD, CAM and CAE Education (pp. 56-70). Hershey: IGI Global.
  • [20] Schon, D. A. (1983). The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.
  • [21] Schon, D. A. (1987). Educating the Reflective Practitioner: Towards a New Design for Teaching and Learning in the Professions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
  • [22] Schon, D. A. (1988). Designing: Rules, types and worlds. Design Studies, 9, 181-190.
  • [23] Schon, D.A. & Wiggins, G. (1992). Kinds of seeing and their functions in designing. Design Studies 13(2): 135–156.
  • [24] Suwa, M. & Tversky, B. (1996). What architects see in their sketches: implications for design tools. In Proceedings of CHI’96 (pp. 191–192). Vancouver, Canada.
  • [25] Suwa, M. & Tversky, B. (2002). How do designers shift their focus of attention in their own sketches? In M. Anderson, B. Meyer, & P. Olivier (Eds.), Diagrammatic reasoning and representation (pp. 241-254). London: Springer.
Como citar:

Agirbas, Asli; "A Teaching Methodology for Parametric Design: A Case Study with Parametric Bench", p-720-725. In: Congreso SIGraDi 2020. São Paulo: Blucher, 2020.
ISSN 23186968, DOI 10.5151/sigradi2020-99

últimos 30 dias

239
downloads

569
visualizações

1035
indexações