Article - Open Access.

Idioma principal

Socialist elements in Soviet design ideology

Jerlei, Triin;

Article:

In this presentation, I will aim to define the Socialist elements of Soviet design ideology during late socialism. I will discuss the Soviet Union in general and define only the ideological qualities of the Soviet design and how they related to questions of form. As Soviet-made products often follow the same design stylistics as Western objects of the same period, it may seem difficult to find a certain design ideology behind them or to pinpoint the Socialist qualities of design. I will argue that the main characteristics of Soviet design ideology are not located in the form of the objects, but rather in their mode of production. Despite the different control mechanisms, there was no centralized organ responsible for industrial design and products were judged mostly on economic or technological grounds. While there were many books and articles on Soviet design and design ideology, none of them actually discuss the questions of form, but rather deal with economics and the purpose of design. Therefore, designers had some artistic freedom and were able to follow modern trends. The ideological qualities of design were hidden rather in the physical and ideological context of production, adding a Socialist quality to all Soviet-made objects.

Article:

Palavras-chave: Soviet Union, socialism, ideology, industrial design, mass production,

Palavras-chave:

DOI: 10.5151/despro-icdhs2014-0085

Referências bibliográficas
  • [1] Azrikan, D. (1999) ‘VNIITE, Dinosaur of Totalitarianism or Plato’s Academy of Design?’ Design Issues, vol 15, pp 45-77.
  • [2] Dubin, H. (1977) Disain sotsialistliku nüüdiskultuuri süsteemis [Design in the system of contemporary socialist culture. Sirp ja Vasar, 15/04/1977.
  • [3] Gerchuk, I. (2000) The Aesthetics of Everyday Life in the Khrushchev Thaw in the USSR (1954-64). In: Crowley, D. Andamp; Reid, S. E. (eds.) Style and socialism: modernity and material culture in post-war Eastern Europe. Oxford: Berg.
  • [4] Hutchings, R. (1978) ‘Soviet Design: The Neglected Partner of Soviet Science and Technology’. Slavic Review, vol 37, pp 567-583.
  • [5] Kantor, K. (1976) Ilu ja tulu [Beauty and benefit]. Sirp ja Vasar, 16/07/1976.
  • [6] Lawrence, P. R., Andamp; Vlachoutsicos, C. (1990). Behind the factory walls : decision making in Soviet and US enterprises. Boston, Mass.: Harvard Business School Press.
  • [7] Lenin, V. (1918) The Immediate Tasks of the Soviet Government [Online]. :. Available: http://marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1918/mar/x03.htm.
  • [8] Oushakine, S. A. (2004) ‘The Flexible and the Pliant: Disturbed Organisms of Soviet Modernity’. Cultural Anthropology, vol 19, pp 392-42
  • [9] Poulantzas, N. (1978) State, power, socialism, London, New Left Books.
  • [10] Roth, P. (1987) Propaganda as an instrument of power. In: VEEN, H.-J. (ed.) From Brezhnev to Gorbachev. Domestic affairs and Soviet foreign policy. Leamington Spa: Berg.
  • [11] Somov, Y. (1971) Tööstustoodete kunstiline konstrueerimine [Artistic construction of industrial objects]. Tallinn: Valgus.
  • [12] Tinn, E. (1976) Disain [Design]. Sirp ja Vasar, 14/05/1976.
Como citar:

Jerlei, Triin; "Socialist elements in Soviet design ideology", p. 587-592 . In: Tradition, Transition, Tragectories: major or minor influences? [=ICDHS 2014 - 9th Conference of the International Committee for Design History and Design Studies]. São Paulo: Blucher, 2014.
ISSN 2318-6968, DOI 10.5151/despro-icdhs2014-0085

últimos 30 dias | último ano | desde a publicação


downloads


visualizações


indexações