Article - Open Access.

Idioma principal

On the Process of Building Knowledge to Support the Design of Digital Tools: A Case Study for Future Residential Buildings on Campus

Soza, Pedro; Swarts, Matthew; Gómez, Paula; Shaw, Jonathan;

Article:

This article presents the process of building knowledge to inform the process of developing a design application for mid-size urban settings. We call such an application Campus Information Modeling – CIM. Four different strategies are exposed, with special interest in a behavioral study regarding users’ qualitative evaluation of buildings they inhabit and how such information will be used in the design of the CIM tool. Finally, implications and future research are discussed.

Article:

Palavras-chave: Campus Information Model, Building knowledge, Behavioral Study, Software Design,

Palavras-chave:

DOI: 10.5151/despro-sigradi2013-0010

Referências bibliográficas
  • [1] Amole, D., (2009). Residential satisfaction in students housing in Nigeria. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 76-85.
  • [2] Balogh, C., Grimm, J., Andamp; Hardy, K., (2005). ACUHO-I Construction and Renovation Data: The latest trends in housing construction and renovation. Journal of College and University Student Housing, 33(2), 51-56.
  • [3] Banning, J., Andamp; Kuk, L., (2011). College housing dissertations: A bounded qualitative meta-study. Journal of College and University Student Housing, 37(2), 91-105.
  • [4] Brandon, A., Hirt, J., Andamp; Cameron, T., (2008). Where you live influences who you know: Differences in student based on residence hall design. Journal of College and University Student Housing, 35(2), 63-78.
  • [5] Carroll, J., Carnaghi, J., Lempfert, T., Andamp; Johnes, K. (2003). What comes first: The program or the facility?. New Directions for Students Services, 101, 53-68.
  • [6] Deninger, L., Andamp; Swift, J. (2009). Integrated design: A sustainable mindset for residence halls. Journal of College and University Student Housing, 36(1), 48-70.
  • [7] Johnson, W.G., Andamp; Cavins, K. (1996). Strategies for enhancing student learning in residence halls. New Directions for Students Services, 75, 69-82.
  • [8] Li, Y., Sheely, M., Andamp; Whalen, D. (2005). Contributors to residence hall student retention: Why do students choose to leave or stay?. Journal of College and University Student Housing, 33(2), 28-36.
  • [9] Najib, N., Yusof, N., Andamp; Osman, Z. (2011). Measuring satisfaction with student housing facilities. American Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 4(1), 52-60.
  • [10] Price, J. (2003). From first design brainstorm session to final coat of paint: Communication, an essential constant. New Directions for Students Services, 101, 39-51.
  • [11] Romano, C. R., Andamp; Hanish, J. (2003). Balancing multiple needs through innovative facility design. New Directions for Students Services, 101, 39-51.
  • [12] Thomsen, J., Andamp; Eikemo, T. (2010). Aspects of student housing satisfaction: A quantitative study. Journal of Housing Andamp; the Built Environment, 25, 273-293.
Como citar:

Soza, Pedro; Swarts, Matthew; Gómez, Paula; Shaw, Jonathan; "On the Process of Building Knowledge to Support the Design of Digital Tools: A Case Study for Future Residential Buildings on Campus", p. 66-70 . In: Proceedings of the XVII Conference of the Iberoamerican Society of Digital Graphics: Knowledge-based Design [=Blucher Design Proceedings, v.1, n.7]. São Paulo: Blucher, 2014.
ISSN 2318-6968, DOI 10.5151/despro-sigradi2013-0010

últimos 30 dias | último ano | desde a publicação


downloads


visualizações


indexações